Em 24-06-2011 09:20, Devin Heitmueller escreveu:
Also, it screws up the ability for users to get fixes through the
media_build tree (unless you are increasing the revision constantly
with every merge you do).
Patches merged, and media_build modified in order to use the V4L2 stack
version,
Em 23-06-2011 18:58, Jesper Juhl escreveu:
It was pointed out by 'make versioncheck' that some includes of
linux/version.h were not needed in include/.
This patch removes them.
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl j...@chaosbits.net
---
include/linux/ceph/messenger.h |1 -
On Friday, June 24, 2011 13:21:14 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 23-06-2011 18:58, Jesper Juhl escreveu:
It was pointed out by 'make versioncheck' that some includes of
linux/version.h were not needed in include/.
This patch removes them.
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl j...@chaosbits.net
Applications are certainly using it. I know this for a fact for the ivtv
driver where
feature improvements are marked that way.
Without more research on how this is used I am not comfortable with this.
Regards,
Hans
MythTV has a bunch of these too (mainly so the code can adapt to
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@infradead.org wrote:
MythTV has a bunch of these too (mainly so the code can adapt to
driver bugs that are fixed in later revisions). Putting Mauro's patch
upstream will definitely cause breakage.
It shouldn't, as ivtv driver
On Friday, June 24, 2011 15:45:59 Devin Heitmueller wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@infradead.org wrote:
MythTV has a bunch of these too (mainly so the code can adapt to
driver bugs that are fixed in later revisions). Putting Mauro's patch
upstream
Em 24-06-2011 10:54, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
On Friday, June 24, 2011 15:45:59 Devin Heitmueller wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@infradead.org wrote:
MythTV has a bunch of these too (mainly so the code can adapt to
driver bugs that are fixed in later
On Jun 24 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 24-06-2011 10:54, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
On Friday, June 24, 2011 15:45:59 Devin Heitmueller wrote:
The versions are increased at the discretion of the driver maintainer,
usually when there is some userland visible change in driver behavior.
I
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Stefan Richter
stef...@s5r6.in-berlin.de wrote:
If the driver version is in fact an ABI version, then the driver author
should really increase it only when ABI behavior is changed (and only if
the behavior change can only be communicated by version number ---
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 14:48 -0400, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Stefan Richter
stef...@s5r6.in-berlin.de wrote:
If the driver version is in fact an ABI version, then the driver author
should really increase it only when ABI behavior is changed (and only if
the
On Jun 24 Devin Heitmueller wrote:
Really, this is all about applications being able to jam a hack into
their code that translates to don't call this ioctl() with some
particular argument if it's driver W less than version X, because the
driver had a bug that is likely to panic the guy's PC.
On Jun 24 Andy Walls wrote:
I also use the driver version for troubleshooting problem with users. I
roughly know what wasn't working in what version of the cx18 and ivtv
drivers. If the end user can tell me the driver version (using v4l2-ctl
--log-status) along with his symptoms, it makes my
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Stefan Richter
stef...@s5r6.in-berlin.de wrote:
Easier:
I run Ubuntu 10.4.
I run kernel 2.6.32.
One of these is usually already included in the first post or IRC message
from the user.
Separate driver versions are only needed on platforms where drivers are
Em 24-06-2011 15:34, Stefan Richter escreveu:
On Jun 24 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 24-06-2011 10:54, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
On Friday, June 24, 2011 15:45:59 Devin Heitmueller wrote:
The versions are increased at the discretion of the driver maintainer,
usually when there is some
Em 24-06-2011 18:22, Devin Heitmueller escreveu:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Stefan Richter
stef...@s5r6.in-berlin.de wrote:
Easier:
I run Ubuntu 10.4.
I run kernel 2.6.32.
One of these is usually already included in the first post or IRC message
from the user.
Separate driver
Em 24-06-2011 18:10, Stefan Richter escreveu:
On Jun 24 Devin Heitmueller wrote:
Really, this is all about applications being able to jam a hack into
their code that translates to don't call this ioctl() with some
particular argument if it's driver W less than version X, because the
driver
Em 24-06-2011 18:04, Andy Walls escreveu:
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 14:48 -0400, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Stefan Richter
stef...@s5r6.in-berlin.de wrote:
If the driver version is in fact an ABI version, then the driver author
should really increase it only when
On Jun 24 Devin Heitmueller wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Stefan Richter
stef...@s5r6.in-berlin.de wrote:
Easier:
I run Ubuntu 10.4.
I run kernel 2.6.32.
One of these is usually already included in the first post or IRC message
from the user.
Separate driver versions
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 19:16 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 24-06-2011 18:04, Andy Walls escreveu:
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 14:48 -0400, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Stefan Richter
stef...@s5r6.in-berlin.de wrote:
If the driver version is in fact an ABI
Em 24-06-2011 19:39, Stefan Richter escreveu:
On Jun 24 Devin Heitmueller wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Stefan Richter
stef...@s5r6.in-berlin.de wrote:
Easier:
I run Ubuntu 10.4.
I run kernel 2.6.32.
One of these is usually already included in the first post or IRC message
from
20 matches
Mail list logo
