On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 19:48:28 +0100
Luca Risolia luca.riso...@studio.unibo.it wrote:
Note that et61x251 and sn9c102 are going to be deprecated and removed at
some
time in the future (gspca will support these devices).
Has this been discussed yet? Also, last time I tried the gspca
On Saturday 12 November 2011 20:46:25 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
Hi all,
This RFC is discussing the current support of JPEG encoders in V4L2 and
a proposal of new JPEG control class.
Motivation
==
JPEG encoder control is also required at the sub-device level, but
currently
On 11/28/2011 01:20 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Saturday 12 November 2011 20:46:25 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
Hi all,
This RFC is discussing the current support of JPEG encoders in V4L2 and
a proposal of new JPEG control class.
...
et61x251, sn9c102, s2255drv.c
-
Hans Verkuil ha scritto:
On Saturday 12 November 2011 20:46:25 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
Hi all,
This RFC is discussing the current support of JPEG encoders in V4L2 and
a proposal of new JPEG control class.
Motivation
==
JPEG encoder control is also required at the sub-device
Hi Sylwester,
Thanks for the RFC. I originally missed it; thanks for pointing to it!
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 08:46:25PM +0100, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
Hi all,
This RFC is discussing the current support of JPEG encoders in V4L2 and
a proposal of new JPEG control class.
Motivation
Hi Sakari,
On 11/26/2011 07:43 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
Hi Sylwester,
Thanks for the RFC. I originally missed it; thanks for pointing to it!
Thanks for your comments!
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 08:46:25PM +0100, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
Hi all,
This RFC is discussing the current support
Hi all,
This RFC is discussing the current support of JPEG encoders in V4L2 and
a proposal of new JPEG control class.
Motivation
==
JPEG encoder control is also required at the sub-device level, but currently
there are only defined ioctls in regular V4L2 device API. It doesn't seem
