On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 8:11 PM, ayaka wrote:
>
>
> On 06/08/2017 06:56 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>
>> Hi Alexandre,
>>
>> On 08/06/17 11:59, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Pawel Osciak
>>> wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 1:08 AM, Hugues FRUC
On 06/08/2017 06:56 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
Hi Alexandre,
On 08/06/17 11:59, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Pawel Osciak wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 1:08 AM, Hugues FRUCHET wrote:
Before merging this work Hans would like to have feedback from peers, in
or
Hi Alexandre,
On 08/06/17 11:59, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Pawel Osciak wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 1:08 AM, Hugues FRUCHET
>> wrote:
>>> Before merging this work Hans would like to have feedback from peers, in
>>> order to be sure that this is i
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Pawel Osciak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 1:08 AM, Hugues FRUCHET wrote:
>> Before merging this work Hans would like to have feedback from peers, in
>> order to be sure that this is inline with other SoC vendors drivers
>> expectations.
>>
>> Thomasz, P
Hi,
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 1:08 AM, Hugues FRUCHET wrote:
> Before merging this work Hans would like to have feedback from peers, in
> order to be sure that this is inline with other SoC vendors drivers
> expectations.
>
> Thomasz, Pawel, could you give your view regarding ChromeOS and Rockchip
On 06/06/2017 03:59 PM, Hugues FRUCHET wrote:
Hi Randy,
Did you get a chance to review interface ?
Oh, I have had look a quick view on it yesterday. The video IP of that
platform doesn't come from the On2, right?
I would really appreciate your feedback in order that we move forward on
this t
Hi Randy,
Did you get a chance to review interface ?
I would really appreciate your feedback in order that we move forward on
this topic and get at least one implementation merged.
Best regards,
Hugues.
On 05/19/2017 10:15 AM, Randy Li wrote:
>
>
> On 05/19/2017 04:08 PM, Hugues FRUCHET wrote
On 05/19/2017 04:08 PM, Hugues FRUCHET wrote:
Hi all,
Here is the latest st-delta MPEG2 code:
[PATCH v6 0/3] Add support for MPEG-2 in DELTA video decoder
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-media@vger.kernel.org/msg112067.html
[PATCH v2 0/3] Add a libv4l plugin for video bitstream parsing
http:
Hi all,
Here is the latest st-delta MPEG2 code:
[PATCH v6 0/3] Add support for MPEG-2 in DELTA video decoder
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-media@vger.kernel.org/msg112067.html
[PATCH v2 0/3] Add a libv4l plugin for video bitstream parsing
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-media@vger.kernel.o
Hi,
Here is an update regarding MPEG-2 implementation based on ST video decoder:
* MPEG-2 API + DELTA kernel driver:
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-media@vger.kernel.org/msg107405.html
* libv4l-codecparsers plugin including MPEG-2 back-end:
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-media@vger.kernel.
On 10/27/2016 09:42 AM, Hugues FRUCHET wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This RFC aims to start discussions in order to define the codec specific
> controls structures to fulfill the low-level decoder API needed by non
> "Stream API" based decoders ("stateless" or "Frame API" based decoders).
Let's refer to thi
On 11/04/2016 09:55 PM, Hugues FRUCHET wrote:
Hi Randy,
thanks for reply, some comments below:
On 10/27/2016 03:08 AM, Randy Li wrote:
On 10/26/2016 11:09 PM, Hugues FRUCHET wrote:
Hi,
This RFC aims to start discussions in order to define the codec specific
controls structures to fulf
Le vendredi 04 novembre 2016 à 14:55 +0100, Hugues FRUCHET a écrit :
> >>
> >> I can help on H264 on a code review basis based on the functional H264
> >> setup I have in-house and codec knowledge, but I cannot provide
> >> implementation in a reasonable timeframe, same for VP8.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
Hi Randy,
thanks for reply, some comments below:
On 10/27/2016 03:08 AM, Randy Li wrote:
>
>
> On 10/26/2016 11:09 PM, Hugues FRUCHET wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> This RFC aims to start discussions in order to define the codec specific
>> controls structures to fulfill the low-level decoder API nee
Hi,
This RFC aims to start discussions in order to define the codec specific
controls structures to fulfill the low-level decoder API needed by non
"Stream API" based decoders ("stateless" or "Frame API" based decoders).
Several implementation exists now which runs on several SoC and various
so
On 10/26/2016 11:09 PM, Hugues FRUCHET wrote:
Hi,
This RFC aims to start discussions in order to define the codec specific
controls structures to fulfill the low-level decoder API needed by non
“Stream API” based decoders (“stateless” or “Frame API” based decoders).
Several implementation e
16 matches
Mail list logo