Hi Hans,
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:52:02AM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Tue August 21 2012 12:44:15 Sakari Ailus wrote:
Hi Hans,
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 08:39:53AM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
...
Currently I've chosen ioctl numbers that are not used by V4L2 (there are a
number of
On Tue August 21 2012 12:44:15 Sakari Ailus wrote:
Hi Hans,
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 08:39:53AM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Mon August 20 2012 22:46:04 Sakari Ailus wrote:
Hi Mauro and Hans,
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 04:05:03PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 20-08-2012
On Mon August 20 2012 22:46:04 Sakari Ailus wrote:
Hi Mauro and Hans,
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 04:05:03PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 20-08-2012 05:30, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
Hi all!
Recently I had to add two new ioctls for the subdev API
(include/linux/v4l2-subdev.h)
Hi Hans,
On Tuesday 21 August 2012 08:39:53 Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Mon August 20 2012 22:46:04 Sakari Ailus wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 04:05:03PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 20-08-2012 05:30, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
Hi all!
Recently I had to add two new ioctls for
Hi Hans,
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 08:39:53AM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Mon August 20 2012 22:46:04 Sakari Ailus wrote:
Hi Mauro and Hans,
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 04:05:03PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 20-08-2012 05:30, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
Hi all!
Recently
Hi Laurent,
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:01:03AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
videodev2.h, and if there was even a loosely corresponding IOCTL in V4L2
then use the same number (e.g. formats vs. media bus pixel codes) and
otherwise something else. The something else case hasn't happened
Hi all!
Recently I had to add two new ioctls for the subdev API
(include/linux/v4l2-subdev.h)
and I noticed that the numbering of the ioctls was somewhat random.
In most cases the ioctl number was the same as the V4L2 API counterpart, but for
subdev-specific ioctls no rule exists.
There are a
Em 20-08-2012 05:30, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
Hi all!
Recently I had to add two new ioctls for the subdev API
(include/linux/v4l2-subdev.h)
and I noticed that the numbering of the ioctls was somewhat random.
In most cases the ioctl number was the same as the V4L2 API counterpart, but
for
Hi Mauro and Hans,
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 04:05:03PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 20-08-2012 05:30, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
Hi all!
Recently I had to add two new ioctls for the subdev API
(include/linux/v4l2-subdev.h)
and I noticed that the numbering of the ioctls was
