Re: [RFC PATCH] ir-kbd-i2c, lirc_zilog: Allow bridge drivers to pass an IR trasnceiver mutex to I2C IR modules

2011-01-16 Thread Andy Walls
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 16:27 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Jarod/Andy, > > For now, I'm marking all those ir-kbd-i2c/lirc_zilog patches as "RFC" at > patchwork, > as I'm not sure if they're ok, and because there are a few revisions of them > and > I'm afraid to apply some wrong version.

Re: [RFC PATCH] ir-kbd-i2c, lirc_zilog: Allow bridge drivers to pass an IR trasnceiver mutex to I2C IR modules

2011-01-16 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Jarod/Andy, For now, I'm marking all those ir-kbd-i2c/lirc_zilog patches as "RFC" at patchwork, as I'm not sure if they're ok, and because there are a few revisions of them and I'm afraid to apply some wrong version. Please, after finishing and testing, send me a patch series or, preferably, a g

[RFC PATCH] ir-kbd-i2c, lirc_zilog: Allow bridge drivers to pass an IR trasnceiver mutex to I2C IR modules

2011-01-15 Thread Andy Walls
The following patch allows bridge drivers, with an I2C IR Tx/Rx transceiver, to pass a mutex for serializing access to a single I2C IR chip between separate IR Tx and Rx modules. The change modifies struct IR_i2c_init_data and struct IR_i2c to add struct mutex *transceiver_lock that ir-k