Hi Antonio,
My apologies for the late review, I missed this the first time around.
Since I am the 'control guy' :-) I thought I should give my view on this.
And that is the real long-term approach to implementing extended controls
in gspca is to add support in gspca for the control framework
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:20:23 +0200
Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl wrote:
I might have some time (no guarantees yet) to help with this. It would
certainly be interesting to add support for the control framework in the
gspca core. Hmm, perhaps that's a job for the weekend...
Hi Hans,
I hope
On Friday, April 27, 2012 11:24:43 Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:20:23 +0200
Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl wrote:
I might have some time (no guarantees yet) to help with this. It would
certainly be interesting to add support for the control framework in the
gspca
Hi,
On 04/27/2012 11:24 AM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:20:23 +0200
Hans Verkuilhverk...@xs4all.nl wrote:
I might have some time (no guarantees yet) to help with this. It would
certainly be interesting to add support for the control framework in the
gspca core. Hmm,
This makes it possible for applications to handle controls with a class
different than V4L2_CTRL_CLASS_USER for gspca subdevices, like for
instance V4L2_CID_EXPOSURE_AUTO which some subdrivers use and which
can't be controlled right now.
See
