On 05/31/2017 01:25 AM, Clint Taylor wrote:
On 05/30/2017 02:29 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On 05/30/2017 10:32 PM, Clint Taylor wrote:
On 05/30/2017 09:54 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On 05/30/2017 06:49 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On 05/30/2017 04:19 PM, Clint Taylor wrote:
On 05/30/2017 12:11 AM
On 05/30/2017 02:29 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On 05/30/2017 10:32 PM, Clint Taylor wrote:
On 05/30/2017 09:54 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On 05/30/2017 06:49 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On 05/30/2017 04:19 PM, Clint Taylor wrote:
On 05/30/2017 12:11 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Tue, 30 May 2017, Ha
On 05/30/2017 10:32 PM, Clint Taylor wrote:
On 05/30/2017 09:54 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On 05/30/2017 06:49 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On 05/30/2017 04:19 PM, Clint Taylor wrote:
On 05/30/2017 12:11 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Tue, 30 May 2017, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On 05/29/2017 09:00 PM, Dan
On 05/30/2017 09:54 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On 05/30/2017 06:49 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On 05/30/2017 04:19 PM, Clint Taylor wrote:
On 05/30/2017 12:11 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Tue, 30 May 2017, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On 05/29/2017 09:00 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12
On 05/30/2017 09:49 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On 05/30/2017 04:19 PM, Clint Taylor wrote:
On 05/30/2017 12:11 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Tue, 30 May 2017, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On 05/29/2017 09:00 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:20:48PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On 05/26
On 05/30/2017 06:49 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On 05/30/2017 04:19 PM, Clint Taylor wrote:
On 05/30/2017 12:11 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Tue, 30 May 2017, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On 05/29/2017 09:00 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:20:48PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On 05/26/2
On 05/30/2017 04:19 PM, Clint Taylor wrote:
On 05/30/2017 12:11 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Tue, 30 May 2017, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On 05/29/2017 09:00 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:20:48PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On 05/26/2017 09:15 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Did you l
On 05/30/2017 12:11 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Tue, 30 May 2017, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On 05/29/2017 09:00 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:20:48PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On 05/26/2017 09:15 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Did you look into also wiring this up for dp mst chain
On Tue, 30 May 2017, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 05/29/2017 09:00 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:20:48PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>> On 05/26/2017 09:15 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Did you look into also wiring this up for dp mst chains?
>>>
>>> Isn't this sufficient? I h
On 05/29/2017 09:00 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:20:48PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On 05/26/2017 09:15 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Did you look into also wiring this up for dp mst chains?
Isn't this sufficient? I have no way of testing mst chains.
I think I need some poi
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:20:48PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 05/26/2017 09:15 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 05:06:26PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >> From: Hans Verkuil
> >>
> >> Implement support for this DisplayPort feature.
> >>
> >> The cec device is created whene
On 05/26/2017 09:15 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 05:06:26PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> From: Hans Verkuil
>>
>> Implement support for this DisplayPort feature.
>>
>> The cec device is created whenever it detects an adapter that
>> has this feature. It is only removed when
On 05/26/2017 12:13 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 25 May 2017, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> @@ -4179,6 +4181,33 @@ intel_dp_check_mst_status(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> +static bool
>> +intel_dp_check_cec_status(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>> +{
>> +bool handle
On Thu, 25 May 2017, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> @@ -4179,6 +4181,33 @@ intel_dp_check_mst_status(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> +static bool
> +intel_dp_check_cec_status(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +{
> + bool handled = false;
> +
> + for (;;) {
> + u
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 05:06:26PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> From: Hans Verkuil
>
> Implement support for this DisplayPort feature.
>
> The cec device is created whenever it detects an adapter that
> has this feature. It is only removed when a new adapter is connected
> that does not support
From: Hans Verkuil
Implement support for this DisplayPort feature.
The cec device is created whenever it detects an adapter that
has this feature. It is only removed when a new adapter is connected
that does not support this. If a new adapter is connected that has
different properties than the p
16 matches
Mail list logo
