What is the exact benefit we're after here by making things common
between all these cores? Code reuse is not a benefit, if it leads to
more expensive maintenance.
We'll, it diverged for the 23885 because the register addressed change for some
registers, it's not the same part. Certainly for t
On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 21:22 -0400, Michael Krufky wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Mauro Carvalho
> Chehab wrote:
> > Em Mon, 7 Sep 2009 18:21:01 -0400
> > Michael Krufky escreveu:
> >
> >> Mauro,
> >>
> >> For the Conexant *reference designs* the firmwares are identical, yes.
> >>
> >> If
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Mauro Carvalho
Chehab wrote:
> Em Mon, 7 Sep 2009 18:21:01 -0400
> Michael Krufky escreveu:
>
>> Mauro,
>>
>> For the Conexant *reference designs* the firmwares are identical, yes.
>>
>> If you look at the windows drivers, there are some additional bits
>> used for
Em Mon, 7 Sep 2009 18:21:01 -0400
Michael Krufky escreveu:
> Mauro,
>
> For the Conexant *reference designs* the firmwares are identical, yes.
>
> If you look at the windows drivers, there are some additional bits
> used for separate firmwares depending on which actual silicon is
> present. T
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Mauro Carvalho
Chehab wrote:
> Em Mon, 7 Sep 2009 12:25:15 -0400
> Michael Krufky escreveu:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Andy Walls wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 03:06 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> >> Em Mon, 7 Sep 2009 01:20:33 -0400
>> >> Mic
Em Mon, 7 Sep 2009 13:42:15 -0500 (CDT)
Mike Isely escreveu:
> On Mon, 7 Sep 2009, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>
>
>[...]
>
> >
> > I remember I asked both Mikes (Michael Krufky and Mike Isely) on March for
> > some
> > tests with the new firmware. I'm not sure if they had some time for
Em Mon, 7 Sep 2009 12:25:15 -0400
Michael Krufky escreveu:
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Andy Walls wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 03:06 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >> Em Mon, 7 Sep 2009 01:20:33 -0400
> >> Michael Krufky escreveu:
> >>
> >> > On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 1:10 AM, Mau
On Mon, 7 Sep 2009, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
[...]
>
> I remember I asked both Mikes (Michael Krufky and Mike Isely) on March for
> some
> tests with the new firmware. I'm not sure if they had some time for testing
> it.
Yes, I remember this exchange. At the time you had mentioned on
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Andy Walls wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 03:06 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> Em Mon, 7 Sep 2009 01:20:33 -0400
>> Michael Krufky escreveu:
>>
>> > On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 1:10 AM, Mauro Carvalho
>> > Chehab wrote:
>> > > Em Fri, 4 Sep 2009 14:05:31 -0400
>
On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 03:06 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Mon, 7 Sep 2009 01:20:33 -0400
> Michael Krufky escreveu:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 1:10 AM, Mauro Carvalho
> > Chehab wrote:
> > > Em Fri, 4 Sep 2009 14:05:31 -0400
> > > Michael Krufky escreveu:
> > >
> > >> Mauro,
> > >>
Em Mon, 7 Sep 2009 10:44:11 +0300
Konstantin Dimitrov escreveu:
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Mauro Carvalho
> Chehab wrote:
> > Em Mon, 7 Sep 2009 01:20:33 -0400
> > Michael Krufky escreveu:
> >
> >> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 1:10 AM, Mauro Carvalho
> >> Chehab wrote:
> >> > Em Fri, 4 Sep 2009
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Mauro Carvalho
Chehab wrote:
> Em Mon, 7 Sep 2009 01:20:33 -0400
> Michael Krufky escreveu:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 1:10 AM, Mauro Carvalho
>> Chehab wrote:
>> > Em Fri, 4 Sep 2009 14:05:31 -0400
>> > Michael Krufky escreveu:
>> >
>> >> Mauro,
>> >>
>> >> This
Em Mon, 7 Sep 2009 01:20:33 -0400
Michael Krufky escreveu:
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 1:10 AM, Mauro Carvalho
> Chehab wrote:
> > Em Fri, 4 Sep 2009 14:05:31 -0400
> > Michael Krufky escreveu:
> >
> >> Mauro,
> >>
> >> This fix should really go to Linus before 2.6.31 is released, if
> >> possible.
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 1:10 AM, Mauro Carvalho
Chehab wrote:
> Em Fri, 4 Sep 2009 14:05:31 -0400
> Michael Krufky escreveu:
>
>> Mauro,
>>
>> This fix should really go to Linus before 2.6.31 is released, if
>> possible. It also should be backported to stable, but I need it in
>> Linus' tree befor
Em Fri, 4 Sep 2009 14:05:31 -0400
Michael Krufky escreveu:
> Mauro,
>
> This fix should really go to Linus before 2.6.31 is released, if
> possible. It also should be backported to stable, but I need it in
> Linus' tree before it will be accepted into -stable.
>
> Do you think you can slip thi
Mauro,
This fix should really go to Linus before 2.6.31 is released, if
possible. It also should be backported to stable, but I need it in
Linus' tree before it will be accepted into -stable.
Do you think you can slip this in before the weekend? As I
understand, Linus plans to release 2.6.31 on
16 matches
Mail list logo
