Em Sat, 21 Jun 2014 05:50:18 +0300
Antti Palosaari cr...@iki.fi escreveu:
Moikka Devin
On 06/21/2014 04:58 AM, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
Hello,
I'm in the process of adding support for a new video decoder. However
in this case it's an IP block on a USB bridge as opposed to the
On June 20, 2014 9:58:19 PM EDT, Devin Heitmueller
dheitmuel...@kernellabs.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm in the process of adding support for a new video decoder. However
in this case it's an IP block on a USB bridge as opposed to the
typical case which is an I2C device. Changing registers for the
On June 21, 2014 7:17:07 AM EDT, Andy Walls awa...@md.metrocast.net wrote:
On June 20, 2014 9:58:19 PM EDT, Devin Heitmueller
dheitmuel...@kernellabs.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm in the process of adding support for a new video decoder. However
in this case it's an IP block on a USB bridge as opposed
Any suggestions welcome (and in particular if you can point me to an
example case where this is already being done).
I'm not aware of any subdevs of that type.
Depending on the nature of the registers in the sub-dev silicon, and
its mode of operation, it may fit into a virtual i2c device model
Hello,
I'm in the process of adding support for a new video decoder. However
in this case it's an IP block on a USB bridge as opposed to the
typical case which is an I2C device. Changing registers for the
subdev is the same mechanism as changing registers in the rest of the
bridge (a specific
Moikka Devin
On 06/21/2014 04:58 AM, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
Hello,
I'm in the process of adding support for a new video decoder. However
in this case it's an IP block on a USB bridge as opposed to the
typical case which is an I2C device. Changing registers for the
subdev is the same
