Hi Alex,
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Alex Gershgorin
wrote:
> Yes, yesterday I sended to Sascha and ARM mailing list another patch
> i.MX35-PDK-Add-regulator-support, this also will need be used.
Ok, good. I saw that patch as well.
It would be really nice if you could fix the I2C
sended to Sascha and ARM mailing list another patch
i.MX35-PDK-Add-regulator-support, this also will need be used.
> > Are you getting the camera image with the correct colors?
Now the camera works fine without any problems, except those,
who have already eliminated :-)
Regards,
Alex Gershgo
Hi Alex,
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 5:54 AM, Alex Gershgorin wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Good news...
> After several number of changes, yesterday the camera started to work :-)
> I will prepare some patches and send them.
Ok, great! Besides your mx35 clock patches: any other patch is
required to gettin
Hi all,
Good news...
After several number of changes, yesterday the camera started to work :-)
I will prepare some patches and send them.
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 07:43:32PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Sascha,
>
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
>
> > It's scheduled t
Em 19-03-2012 19:37, Sascha Hauer escreveu:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 07:17:27PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> Em 19-03-2012 19:03, Mauro Carvalho Chehab escreveu:
>>> Em 13-03-2012 12:05, Alex Gershgorin escreveu:
>>>> In i.MX35-PDK, OV2640 camera is pop
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 07:43:32PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Sascha,
>
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
>
> > It's scheduled there. I should have responded with an applied message.
>
> Please apply this one too: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/144942/
>
Will do.
Hi Sascha,
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> It's scheduled there. I should have responded with an applied message.
Please apply this one too: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/144942/
Otherwise camera device cannot register.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 07:17:27PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em 19-03-2012 19:03, Mauro Carvalho Chehab escreveu:
> > Em 13-03-2012 12:05, Alex Gershgorin escreveu:
> >> In i.MX35-PDK, OV2640 camera is populated on the
> >> personality board. This camera i
Em 19-03-2012 19:03, Mauro Carvalho Chehab escreveu:
> Em 13-03-2012 12:05, Alex Gershgorin escreveu:
>> In i.MX35-PDK, OV2640 camera is populated on the
>> personality board. This camera is registered as a subdevice via soc-camera
>> interface.
>>
>> Signed-of
Em 13-03-2012 12:05, Alex Gershgorin escreveu:
> In i.MX35-PDK, OV2640 camera is populated on the
> personality board. This camera is registered as a subdevice via soc-camera
> interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Gershgorin
Patch doesn't apply over v3.3:
patching file ar
In i.MX35-PDK, OV2640 camera is populated on the
personality board. This camera is registered as a subdevice via soc-camera
interface.
Signed-off-by: Alex Gershgorin
---
arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-mx35_3ds.c | 96 +
1 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 0
Hi Fabio,
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Alex wrote:
> In i.MX35-PDK, OV2640 camera is populated on the
> personality board. This camera is registered as a subdevice via soc-camera
> interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Gershgorin
> >Are you able to get the camera
Hi Sascha,
Thanks for you comments.
> In i.MX35-PDK, OV2640 camera is populated on the
> personality board. This camera is registered as a subdevice via soc-camera
> interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Gershgorin
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-imx/m
Hi Alex,
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Alex wrote:
> In i.MX35-PDK, OV2640 camera is populated on the
> personality board. This camera is registered as a subdevice via soc-camera
> interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Gershgorin
Are you able to get the camera working correct
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 06:28:51PM +0200, Alex wrote:
> In i.MX35-PDK, OV2640 camera is populated on the
> personality board. This camera is registered as a subdevice via soc-camera
> interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Gershgorin
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-imx/m
In i.MX35-PDK, OV2640 camera is populated on the
personality board. This camera is registered as a subdevice via soc-camera
interface.
Signed-off-by: Alex Gershgorin
---
arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-mx35_3ds.c | 87 +
1 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 0
need of changing the hardware.
You're right, currently mainline Linux kernel i.MX35 PDK platform does not
support power management
devices, probably for this reason was the need for small changes in equipment.
> On my display I see snow flickering and unfortunately not a live video from
>
On 3/12/12, Alex Gershgorin wrote:
> 1. Back resistor 172 to the default value.
>
> 2. Removed the resistor 146, through which a voltage was applied from a PMIC
> (EXT_3V) on "CMOS_VIO".
>
> 3. Connecting a resistor 147 which supplies power from the LDO_3V3 on
> "CMOS_VIO".
The camera on the FSL
On 3/8/12, Alex Gershgorin wrote:
> Setting pipeline to PAUSED ...mx3-camera mx3-camera.0: MX3 Camera driver
> attached to camera 0
> /GstPipeline:pipeline0/GstV4l2Src:v4l2src0.GstPad:src: caps =
> video/x-raw-yuv, format=(fourcc)UYVY, framerate=(fraction)25/1,
> width=(int)320, height=(int)240,
>On my mx31pdk I get the same dmaengine errors and the ov2640 does work fine.
>I think you can go ahead and try to use the camera on the mx35pdk now.
>You can try:
>gst-launch -v v4l2src device=/dev/video0 !
>video/x-raw-yuv,width=320,height=240,framerate=25/1 ! ffmpegcolorspace
>! fbdevsink
Hi Guennadi,
Thanks for you comments...
>>>Hi Alex
>>>Why is the cc-list mangled again? Why is the V4L list dropped again?
>>>What's so difficult about hitting the "reply-to-all" button?
You are absolutely right, I hope that now the cc-list valid.
> Hi Fabio,
>
> Thanks for you response...
>
> Yes this I2C problem, all I2C slave device need response to Host CPU by
> pulls I2C data bus to low, in other words generate ACK, the clock pulse for
> the acknowledge bit is always created by the bus master.
>
> In this case, the camera tries to reset the data bus and generate an ACK,
> but th
Hi Alex
Why is the cc-list mangled again? Why is the V4L list dropped again?
What's so difficult about hitting the "reply-to-all" button?
On Thu, 8 Mar 2012, Alex Gershgorin wrote:
> Hi Fabio,
>
> Thanks for you response...
>
> > in spite of this I get from ov2640 driver error
> > Here Linux
23 matches
Mail list logo