Hi Phillip,
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 06:03:38PM +, Phillip Norisez wrote:
> Hans,
>
> I fear that in my ignorance of V4L2, I have backed my client into a
> corner, so to speak. I am developing embedded Linux firmware for boards
> intended to driver video sensors within a medical device. As suc
ies
>
> Office: 303.835.7494
> phillip.nori...@creationtech.com | www.creationtech.com
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Hans Verkuil [mailto:hverk...@xs4all.nl]
> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 5:55 AM
> To: Phillip Norisez
> Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Technologies
Office: 303.835.7494
phillip.nori...@creationtech.com | www.creationtech.com
-Original Message-
From: Hans Verkuil [mailto:hverk...@xs4all.nl]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 5:55 AM
To: Phillip Norisez
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Media controller versus int device in V4L2
On Wed May 8 2013 17:06:17 Phillip Norisez wrote:
> I have the following question, who or what can help me with some information
> on the specific differences, from a programming viewpoint, between the "media
> controller" and "int device" frameworks for V4L2?
v4l2-int-device is deprecated and s
I have the following question, who or what can help me with some information on
the specific differences, from a programming viewpoint, between the "media
controller" and "int device" frameworks for V4L2? A checklist for forward and
back porting is what I seek, but I don't expect such a thing t
