Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Mauro,
>
> On Friday 21 May 2010 17:03:04 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>> On Friday 21 May 2010 16:05:29 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans Verkuil wrote:
> I had hoped to get hardware to test it with, but no such luck (yet).
> B
Hi Mauro,
On Friday 21 May 2010 17:03:04 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Friday 21 May 2010 16:05:29 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >> Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >>> I had hoped to get hardware to test it with, but no such luck (yet).
> >>> But there seems to be no sense i
Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Mauro,
>
> On Friday 21 May 2010 16:05:29 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>> I had hoped to get hardware to test it with, but no such luck (yet). But
>>> there seems to be no sense in holding these patches back on the
>>> off-chance that I can get
Hi Mauro,
On Friday 21 May 2010 16:05:29 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > I had hoped to get hardware to test it with, but no such luck (yet). But
> > there seems to be no sense in holding these patches back on the
> > off-chance that I can get hardware.
> >
> > Gerard, you
Hans Verkuil wrote:
> I had hoped to get hardware to test it with, but no such luck (yet). But
> there seems to be no sense in holding these patches back on the off-chance
> that I can get hardware.
>
> Gerard, you mentioned earlier that you actually had a c-qcam. It would be
> nice if you can tes
