Hans Verkuil wrote:
Hi all,
There are lot's of discussions, but it can be hard sometimes to actually
determine someone's opinion.
So here is a quick poll, please reply either to the list or directly to me
with your yes/no answer and (optional but welcome) a short explanation to
your
Hans Verkuil wrote:
Hi all,
There are lot's of discussions, but it can be hard sometimes to actually
determine someone's opinion.
So here is a quick poll, please reply either to the list or directly to
me
with your yes/no answer and (optional but welcome) a short explanation
to
your
Should we drop support for kernels 2.6.22 in our v4l-dvb repository?
_: Yes
_: No
YES.
Optional question:
Why:
I assume that the main goal should be development of linux v4l/dvb
drivers to be included in *new* kernel versions. These dont need compat
code.
But beside of the main
Should we drop support for kernels 2.6.22 in our v4l-dvb
repository?
_: Yes
_: No
Yes.
Optional question:
Why:
Most distros offer the lastest kernels. I had requests for old kernels,
but these ones were very old (2.6.10!).
--
Ken ar c'hentañ | ** Breizh ha Linux atav!
Should we drop support for kernels 2.6.22 in our v4l-dvb repository?
_: Yes
_: No
YES (but I would go even further)
Optional question:
Why:
The aim should be to bring improvements to the released Linux kernel.
The *only* point relevant for both development and testing is
Should we drop support for kernels 2.6.22 in our v4l-dvb repository?
_: Yes
_: No
Yes.
Why:
I'm a v4l-user, I use my VDR for a couple of years now. These were the
steps I took, before I assembled my box:
- I have analog cable, so what hardware does exist, that is capable to
record
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Hans Verkuil wrote:
Hi all,
There are lot's of discussions, but it can be hard sometimes to actually
determine someone's opinion.
So here is a quick poll, please reply either to the list or directly to me
with your yes/no answer and (optional but welcome) a short
Jean Delvare wrote:
* Enterprise-class distributions (RHEL, SLED) are not the right target
for the v4l-dvb repository, so we don't care which kernels these are
running.
I think you should be aware that the mythtv and ATrpms communities
include a significant number of people who have
Please reply to this poll if you haven't done so yet. I only count clear
yes/no answers, so if you replied earlier to this in order to discuss a
point then I haven't counted that.
Currently it's 16 yes and 2 no votes, but I'd really like to see some more
input. I want to post the final results
On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 11:15 +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
Hi all,
There are lot's of discussions, but it can be hard sometimes to actually
determine someone's opinion.
So here is a quick poll, please reply either to the list or directly to me
with your yes/no answer and (optional but
John Pilkington wrote:
Jean Delvare wrote:
* Enterprise-class distributions (RHEL, SLED) are not the right target
for the v4l-dvb repository, so we don't care which kernels these are
running.
I think you should be aware that the mythtv and ATrpms communities
include a significant
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Should we drop support for kernels 2.6.22 in our v4l-dvb repository?
_: Yes
_: No
NO.
Optional question:
Why:
Dropping support for older kernels means dropping support for MOST testers.
Sure, it's an
Hello all,
My vote is YES, why haven't we done this already??
My understanding is that we are just drop old kernel support and retaining the
vast majority of the drivers.
If anyone tallied the total number CVE listed vulernabilites and other problems
fixed since then they would probably be
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 24.02.2009, 16:02 -0500 schrieb Michael Krufky:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Should we drop support for kernels 2.6.22 in our v4l-dvb repository?
_: Yes
_: No
NO.
this is an unwanted reply to Hans' polling, but I
Hans Verkuil wrote:
Hi all,
There are lot's of discussions, but it can be hard sometimes to actually
determine someone's opinion.
So here is a quick poll, please reply either to the list or directly to me
with your yes/no answer and (optional but welcome) a short explanation to
your
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 2:15 AM, Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Should we drop support for kernels 2.6.22 in our v4l-dvb repository?
_: Yes
_: No
Yes.
Optional question:
Why:
The reasons already stated, those resources could be better used doing
other things. Aside of that, of
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 11:15:01 +0100
Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Hi all,
There are lot's of discussions, but it can be hard sometimes to actually
determine someone's opinion.
So here is a quick poll, please reply either to the list or directly to me
with your yes/no answer and
Hi Hans,
There are lot's of discussions, but it can be hard sometimes to actually
determine someone's opinion.
So here is a quick poll, please reply either to the list or directly to me
with your yes/no answer and (optional but welcome) a short explanation to
your standpoint. It doesn't
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Jean Delvare wrote:
There are lot's of discussions, but it can be hard sometimes to actually
determine someone's opinion.
So here is a quick poll, please reply either to the list or directly to me
with your yes/no answer and (optional but welcome) a short explanation
Hello Hans,
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 11:15:01 +0100
Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Hi all,
There are lot's of discussions, but it can be hard sometimes to
actually determine someone's opinion.
So here is a quick poll, please reply either to the list or directly
to me with your yes/no
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Hi all,
There are lot's of discussions, but it can be hard sometimes to actually
determine someone's opinion.
So here is a quick poll, please reply either to the list or directly to me
with your yes/no answer and
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:26:57 -0300
Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@infradead.org wrote:
I'm right now working on another way of allowing backport that will better
scale, and will allow developers to use -git, without losing backport for
users.
I have an incomplete skeleton for the backport
Hello Hans,
Hans Verkuil schrieb:
We still need to support kernels from 2.6.22 onwards. Although I think the
minimum supported kernel is something that needs a regular sanity check,
right now there are no technical reasons that I am aware of to go to
something newer than 2.6.22.
Whether we
Hello Hans,
Hans Verkuil schrieb:
We still need to support kernels from 2.6.22 onwards. Although I think
the
minimum supported kernel is something that needs a regular sanity check,
right now there are no technical reasons that I am aware of to go to
something newer than 2.6.22.
Whether
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, David Ellingsworth wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Optional question:
Why can't we drop support for all but the latest kernel?
Why:
As others have already pointed out, it is a waste of time for
developers who
On Tuesday 24 February 2009 06:04:48 Trent Piepho wrote:
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, David Ellingsworth wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl
wrote:
Optional question:
Why can't we drop support for all but the latest kernel?
Why:
As others have
Hi all,
There are lot's of discussions, but it can be hard sometimes to actually
determine someone's opinion.
So here is a quick poll, please reply either to the list or directly to me
with your yes/no answer and (optional but welcome) a short explanation to
your standpoint. It doesn't matter
Hans Verkuil wrote:
Should we drop support for kernels 2.6.22 in our v4l-dvb repository?
Yes
Optional question:
Why:
Its causing skilled developers to waste time that would be better served
in other areas. Because of that, these skilled volunteers are becoming
frustrated and
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Hans Verkuil wrote:
Hi all,
There are lot's of discussions, but it can be hard sometimes to actually
determine someone's opinion.
So here is a quick poll, please reply either to the list or directly to me
with your yes/no answer and (optional but welcome) a short
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Hans Verkuil wrote:
Hi all,
There are lot's of discussions, but it can be hard sometimes to actually
determine someone's opinion.
So here is a quick poll, please reply either to the list or directly to me
with your yes/no answer and (optional but welcome) a short
On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 14:12 -0500, CityK wrote:
The V4L-DVB is lacking in strategic direction. Yesterday was the time
to adopt one; so lets pick up one today!
CityK,
I see you've been reading (or channeling) my blathering:
http://www.linuxtv.org/irc/v4l/index.php?date=2009-02-20
([19:42]
Am Sonntag, den 22.02.2009, 11:15 +0100 schrieb Hans Verkuil:
Hi all,
There are lot's of discussions, but it can be hard sometimes to actually
determine someone's opinion.
So here is a quick poll, please reply either to the list or directly to me
with your yes/no answer and (optional
Yes...
On Mon Feb 23 12:13 , hermann pitton sent:
Am Sonntag, den 22.02.2009, 11:15 +0100 schrieb Hans Verkuil:
Hi all,
There are lot's of discussions, but it can be hard sometimes to actually
determine someone's opinion.
So here is a quick poll, please reply either to the list or
Andy Walls wrote:
On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 14:12 -0500, CityK wrote:
The V4L-DVB is lacking in strategic direction. Yesterday was the time
to adopt one; so lets pick up one today!
CityK,
I see you've been reading (or channeling) my blathering:
2009/2/22 Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl:
Hi all,
There are lot's of discussions, but it can be hard sometimes to actually
determine someone's opinion.
So here is a quick poll, please reply either to the list or directly to me
with your yes/no answer and (optional but welcome) a short
35 matches
Mail list logo
