On 08/31/2018 01:37 AM, Lucas Magalhães wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 3:49 AM Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>
>> My basic idea was that you use a TPG state structure that contains the
>> desired output: the sensor starts with e.g. 720p using some bayer
>> pixelformat,
>> the debayer module replaces
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 3:49 AM Hans Verkuil wrote:
>
> My basic idea was that you use a TPG state structure that contains the
> desired output: the sensor starts with e.g. 720p using some bayer pixelformat,
> the debayer module replaces the pixelformat with e.g. PIX_FMT_RGB32, a
> grayscale
On 8/22/18 3:49 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 08/22/2018 05:35 AM, Helen Koike wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> One of the discussions we had when developing Vimc, was regarding
>> optimizing image generation.
>> The ideia was to generate the images directly in the capture instead
>> of propagating
On 08/22/2018 05:35 AM, Helen Koike wrote:
> Hello,
>
> One of the discussions we had when developing Vimc, was regarding
> optimizing image generation.
> The ideia was to generate the images directly in the capture instead
> of propagating through the pipeline (to make things faster).
> But my
Hello,
One of the discussions we had when developing Vimc, was regarding
optimizing image generation.
The ideia was to generate the images directly in the capture instead
of propagating through the pipeline (to make things faster).
But my question is: if this optimization is on, and if there is a
