RE: [PATCH V3 10/15] [media] marvell-ccic: split mcam-core into 2 parts for soc_camera support

2013-02-05 Thread Albert Wang
Hi, Jonathan Thanks a lot for explaining it. :) -Original Message- From: Jonathan Corbet [mailto:cor...@lwn.net] Sent: Tuesday, 05 February, 2013 11:14 To: Albert Wang Cc: g.liakhovet...@gmx.de; linux-media@vger.kernel.org; Libin Yang Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 10/15] [media] marvell-ccic

Re: [PATCH V3 10/15] [media] marvell-ccic: split mcam-core into 2 parts for soc_camera support

2013-02-04 Thread Jonathan Corbet
My apologies for the slow response...I'm running far behind. On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:29:13 -0800 Albert Wang twan...@marvell.com wrote: As you know, we are working on adding B_DMA_SG support on soc_camera mode. We found there is some code we can't understand in irq handler: if (handled

RE: [PATCH V3 10/15] [media] marvell-ccic: split mcam-core into 2 parts for soc_camera support

2013-01-31 Thread Albert Wang
Subject: RE: [PATCH V3 10/15] [media] marvell-ccic: split mcam-core into 2 parts for soc_camera support Hi, Jonathan -Original Message- From: Jonathan Corbet [mailto:cor...@lwn.net] Sent: Wednesday, 19 December, 2012 03:15 To: Albert Wang Cc: g.liakhovet...@gmx.de; linux-media

Re: [PATCH V3 10/15] [media] marvell-ccic: split mcam-core into 2 parts for soc_camera support

2012-12-18 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 19:04:26 -0800 Albert Wang twan...@marvell.com wrote: [Albert Wang] So if we add B_DMA_SG and B_VMALLOC support and OLPC XO 1.0 support in soc_camera mode. Then we can just remove the original mode and only support soc_camera mode in marvell-ccic? That is the idea, yes.

RE: [PATCH V3 10/15] [media] marvell-ccic: split mcam-core into 2 parts for soc_camera support

2012-12-18 Thread Albert Wang
Hi, Jonathan -Original Message- From: Jonathan Corbet [mailto:cor...@lwn.net] Sent: Wednesday, 19 December, 2012 03:15 To: Albert Wang Cc: g.liakhovet...@gmx.de; linux-media@vger.kernel.org; Libin Yang Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 10/15] [media] marvell-ccic: split mcam-core into 2 parts

Re: [PATCH V3 10/15] [media] marvell-ccic: split mcam-core into 2 parts for soc_camera support

2012-12-17 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 14:12:11 -0800 Albert Wang twan...@marvell.com wrote: - Is the soc_camera mode necessary? Is there something you're trying to do that can't be done without it? Or, at least, does it add sufficient benefit to be worth this work? It would be nice if the

RE: [PATCH V3 10/15] [media] marvell-ccic: split mcam-core into 2 parts for soc_camera support

2012-12-17 Thread Albert Wang
Hi, Jonathan -Original Message- From: Jonathan Corbet [mailto:cor...@lwn.net] Sent: Monday, 17 December, 2012 23:29 To: Albert Wang Cc: g.liakhovet...@gmx.de; linux-media@vger.kernel.org; Libin Yang Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 10/15] [media] marvell-ccic: split mcam-core into 2 parts

Re: [PATCH V3 10/15] [media] marvell-ccic: split mcam-core into 2 parts for soc_camera support

2012-12-16 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 17:57:59 +0800 Albert Wang twan...@marvell.com wrote: This patch splits mcam-core into 2 parts to prepare for soc_camera support. The first part remains in mcam-core.c. This part includes the HW operations and vb2 callback functions. The second part is moved to

RE: [PATCH V3 10/15] [media] marvell-ccic: split mcam-core into 2 parts for soc_camera support

2012-12-16 Thread Albert Wang
Hi, Jonathan -Original Message- From: Jonathan Corbet [mailto:cor...@lwn.net] Sent: Monday, 17 December, 2012 00:37 To: Albert Wang Cc: g.liakhovet...@gmx.de; linux-media@vger.kernel.org; Libin Yang Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 10/15] [media] marvell-ccic: split mcam-core into 2 parts