Re: RFC: V4L2 driver for Qualcomm MSM camera.

2011-01-07 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi, On Friday 07 January 2011 01:03:58 Yupeng Yan wrote: Thanks for the comments - certainly good arguments to our lawyers :-)... actually the information of how to config the ISP HW is requested to be protected for now, we are working on certain degree of openness. The HW config code is

Re: RFC: V4L2 driver for Qualcomm MSM camera.

2011-01-06 Thread Yupeng Yan
Thanks for the comments - certainly good arguments to our lawyers :-)... actually the information of how to config the ISP HW is requested to be protected for now, we are working on certain degree of openness. The HW config code is just a small part of the user space (daemon) tasks, the user

Re: RFC: V4L2 driver for Qualcomm MSM camera.

2011-01-04 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Shuzhen, On Tuesday 04 January 2011 03:37:10 Shuzhen Wang wrote: On Tuesday, December 28, 2010 12:24 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote: I will strongly NAK any implementation that requires a daemon. We understand the motivation behind making the daemon optional. However there are

Re: RFC: V4L2 driver for Qualcomm MSM camera.

2011-01-04 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Jeff, On Tuesday 04 January 2011 07:14:00 Haibo Zhong wrote: On 1/3/2011 6:37 PM, Shuzhen Wang wrote: On Tuesday, December 28, 2010 12:24 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote: I will strongly NAK any implementation that requires a daemon. We understand the motivation behind making the daemon

Re: RFC: V4L2 driver for Qualcomm MSM camera.

2011-01-04 Thread Hans Verkuil
Hi Jeff, On Tuesday 04 January 2011 07:14:00 Haibo Zhong wrote: On 1/3/2011 6:37 PM, Shuzhen Wang wrote: On Tuesday, December 28, 2010 12:24 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote: I will strongly NAK any implementation that requires a daemon. We understand the motivation behind making the daemon

Re: RFC: V4L2 driver for Qualcomm MSM camera.

2011-01-04 Thread Sakari Ailus
Subject: Re: RFC: V4L2 driver for Qualcomm MSM camera. I will strongly NAK any implementation that requires a daemon. We understand the motivation behind making the daemon optional. However there are restrictions from legal perspective, which we don't know how to get around. A simplest

Re: RFC: V4L2 driver for Qualcomm MSM camera.

2011-01-04 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em 04-01-2011 08:40, Hans Verkuil escreveu: Hi Jeff, On Tuesday 04 January 2011 07:14:00 Haibo Zhong wrote: On 1/3/2011 6:37 PM, Shuzhen Wang wrote: On Tuesday, December 28, 2010 12:24 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote: I will strongly NAK any implementation that requires a daemon. We understand

Re: RFC: V4L2 driver for Qualcomm MSM camera.

2011-01-04 Thread Markus Rechberger
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com wrote: Em 04-01-2011 08:40, Hans Verkuil escreveu: Hi Jeff, On Tuesday 04 January 2011 07:14:00 Haibo Zhong wrote: On 1/3/2011 6:37 PM, Shuzhen Wang wrote: On Tuesday, December 28, 2010 12:24 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote:

RE: RFC: V4L2 driver for Qualcomm MSM camera.

2011-01-04 Thread Yan, Yupeng
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Hans Verkuil; Laurent Pinchart; Haibo Zhong; Shuzhen Wang; linux-media@vger.kernel.org; Yan, Yupeng; Zhong, Jeff Subject: Re: RFC: V4L2 driver for Qualcomm MSM camera. On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com wrote: Em 04-01-2011 08

Re: RFC: V4L2 driver for Qualcomm MSM camera.

2011-01-04 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi, On Tuesday 04 January 2011 20:37:31 Yan, Yupeng wrote: We will exploring the usage of libv4l2...however we still have the difficulties to open-source hardware: our ISP and sensors, will need help on how to address such issues. I suppose you mean open-sourcing hardware driver. There's no

RE: RFC: V4L2 driver for Qualcomm MSM camera.

2011-01-03 Thread Shuzhen Wang
-Original Message- From: Laurent Pinchart [mailto:laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 12:24 PM To: Shuzhen Wang Cc: 'Mauro Carvalho Chehab'; 'Hans Verkuil'; linux- me...@vger.kernel.org; hzh...@codeaurora.org; Yan, Yupeng Subject: Re: RFC: V4L2 driver

Re: RFC: V4L2 driver for Qualcomm MSM camera.

2011-01-03 Thread Haibo Zhong
, Yupeng Subject: Re: RFC: V4L2 driver for Qualcomm MSM camera. I will strongly NAK any implementation that requires a daemon. We understand the motivation behind making the daemon optional. However there are restrictions from legal perspective, which we don't know how to get around. A simplest

RE: RFC: V4L2 driver for Qualcomm MSM camera.

2010-12-28 Thread Shuzhen Wang
-Original Message- From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab [mailto:mche...@redhat.com] Sent: Monday, December 27, 2010 4:12 AM To: Hans Verkuil Cc: Shuzhen Wang; linux-media@vger.kernel.org; hzh...@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: RFC: V4L2 driver for Qualcomm MSM camera. Em 24-12-2010 09:19, Hans

Re: RFC: V4L2 driver for Qualcomm MSM camera.

2010-12-28 Thread Laurent Pinchart
: RFC: V4L2 driver for Qualcomm MSM camera. Em 24-12-2010 09:19, Hans Verkuil escreveu: MSM_CAM_IOCTL_SENSOR_IO_CFG Get or set sensor configurations: fps, line_pf, pixels_pl, exposure and gain, etc. The setting is stored in sensor_cfg_data structure

Re: RFC: V4L2 driver for Qualcomm MSM camera.

2010-12-27 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em 24-12-2010 09:19, Hans Verkuil escreveu: Good to hear from Qualcomm! I've made some comments below: On Thursday, December 23, 2010 20:38:04 Shuzhen Wang wrote: Hello, This is the architecture overview we put together for Qualcomm MSM camera support in linux-media tree. Your comments

Re: RFC: V4L2 driver for Qualcomm MSM camera.

2010-12-24 Thread Hans Verkuil
Good to hear from Qualcomm! I've made some comments below: On Thursday, December 23, 2010 20:38:04 Shuzhen Wang wrote: Hello, This is the architecture overview we put together for Qualcomm MSM camera support in linux-media tree. Your comments are very much appreciated! Introduction