Re: STV090x FE_READ_STATUS implementation

2011-05-24 Thread Guy Martin
On Tue, 24 May 2011 21:05:33 +0200 Sébastien RAILLARD (COEXSI) wrote: > > > > > In my case, the STV0903 is reporting the five following states : > > > SCVYL. > > > > > > > Indeed, after some more troubleshooting, I found out that the > > problem is not in the STV6110 but in the STV090X code. T

RE: STV090x FE_READ_STATUS implementation

2011-05-24 Thread COEXSI
> -Original Message- > From: linux-media-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-media- > ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Guy Martin > Sent: mardi 24 mai 2011 20:45 > To: Sébastien RAILLARD (COEXSI) > Cc: abraham.m...@gmail.com; linux-media@vger.kernel.org >

Re: STV090x FE_READ_STATUS implementation

2011-05-24 Thread Guy Martin
On Tue, 24 May 2011 19:47:17 +0200 Sébastien RAILLARD (COEXSI) wrote: > > Does the STV6110 supports reporting of signal, carrier, viterbi and > > sync ? > > > > I've done some tests with the CineS2, that is using the STV6110A as > the tuner and the STV0903 as the demodulator. > > The values yo