RFC: Move the deprecated et61x251 and sn9c102 to staging

2011-01-01 Thread Hans Verkuil
The subject says it all: If there are no objections, then I propose that the deprecated et61x251 and sn9c102 are moved to staging for 2.6.38 and marked for removal in 2.6.39. If there are no objections, then I'll make a patch for this. Regards, Hans -- Hans Verkuil - video4linux devel

Re: RFC: Move the deprecated et61x251 and sn9c102 to staging

2011-01-02 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em 01-01-2011 17:53, Hans Verkuil escreveu: > The subject says it all: > > If there are no objections, then I propose that the deprecated et61x251 and > sn9c102 are moved to staging for 2.6.38 and marked for removal in 2.6.39. Nack. There are several USB ID's on sn9c102 not covered by gspca driv

Re: RFC: Move the deprecated et61x251 and sn9c102 to staging

2011-01-02 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Sunday, January 02, 2011 11:41:31 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em 01-01-2011 17:53, Hans Verkuil escreveu: > > The subject says it all: > > > > If there are no objections, then I propose that the deprecated et61x251 and > > sn9c102 are moved to staging for 2.6.38 and marked for removal in 2.6

Re: RFC: Move the deprecated et61x251 and sn9c102 to staging

2011-01-02 Thread Jean-Francois Moine
On Sun, 2 Jan 2011 12:25:21 +0100 Hans Verkuil wrote: > > It seems to me that et61x251 will also stay there for a long time, > > as there are just two devices supported by gspca driver, while > > et61x251 supports 25. > > > > Btw, we currently have a conflict with this USB ID: > > USB_DEVICE

Re: RFC: Move the deprecated et61x251 and sn9c102 to staging

2011-01-02 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 01/02/2011 12:25 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote: On Sunday, January 02, 2011 11:41:31 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: Em 01-01-2011 17:53, Hans Verkuil escreveu: The subject says it all: If there are no objections, then I propose that the deprecated et61x251 and sn9c102 are moved to staging for 2

Re: RFC: Move the deprecated et61x251 and sn9c102 to staging

2011-01-02 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, One small correction to the sn9c102 sensor table, the mt9v111 sensor is handled by sonixj, so the table of bridge/sensor combi's supported by sn9c102, looks like this: sn9c101/102: hv7131d mi0343 * ov7630 pas106b pas202bcb tas5110c1b tas5110d tas5130d1b sn9c103: hv7131r * mi0360 * ov7630 pa

Re: RFC: Move the deprecated et61x251 and sn9c102 to staging

2011-01-02 Thread Hans Verkuil
Hi Hans, On Sunday, January 02, 2011 19:33:31 Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > One small correction to the sn9c102 sensor table, the > mt9v111 sensor is handled by sonixj, so the table of > bridge/sensor combi's supported by sn9c102, looks like this: > > sn9c101/102: > hv7131d > mi0343 * > ov7630

Re: RFC: Move the deprecated et61x251 and sn9c102 to staging

2011-01-03 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 01/02/2011 09:13 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote: Hi Hans, On Sunday, January 02, 2011 19:33:31 Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, One small correction to the sn9c102 sensor table, the mt9v111 sensor is handled by sonixj, so the table of bridge/sensor combi's supported by sn9c102, looks like this: sn9c1

Re: RFC: Move the deprecated et61x251 and sn9c102 to staging

2011-01-09 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 01/02/2011 09:13 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote: Hi Hans, On Sunday, January 02, 2011 19:33:31 Hans de Goede wrote: So only 3 raw bayer + custom compression models supported by sn9c102 are not supported by gspca_sonixb, and all jpeg models are supported by gspca_sonixj. Porting the 3 remain

Re: RFC: Move the deprecated et61x251 and sn9c102 to staging

2011-01-09 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em 09-01-2011 10:02, Hans de Goede escreveu: > Hi, > > On 01/02/2011 09:13 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote: >> Hi Hans, >> >> On Sunday, January 02, 2011 19:33:31 Hans de Goede wrote: > > > >>> So only 3 raw bayer + custom compression models supported by >>> sn9c102 are not supported by gspca_sonixb, an

Re: RFC: Move the deprecated et61x251 and sn9c102 to staging

2011-01-10 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 01/10/2011 02:33 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: Em 09-01-2011 10:02, Hans de Goede escreveu: I've managed to make some time to also sort out the sn9c1xx usb ids situation. I've just send a pull request which includes patches cleaning things up. After this there are only 5 usb-ids

Re: RFC: Move the deprecated et61x251 and sn9c102 to staging

2011-01-10 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em 10-01-2011 08:28, Hans de Goede escreveu: > Hi, > > On 01/10/2011 02:33 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: >> Em 09-01-2011 10:02, Hans de Goede escreveu: > > > >>> I've managed to make some time to also sort out the sn9c1xx usb ids >>> situation. I've just send a pull request which includes