Re: RFC: Power states and VIDIOC_STREAMON

Em Fri, 21 Apr 2017 14:09:37 -0400 Devin Heitmueller escreveu: > >> I had always interpreted it such that the STREAMON call just > >> controlled whether the DMA engine was running, and thus you could do > >> anything else with the decoder before calling STREAMON

Re: RFC: Power states and VIDIOC_STREAMON

>> I had always interpreted it such that the STREAMON call just >> controlled whether the DMA engine was running, and thus you could do >> anything else with the decoder before calling STREAMON other than >> actually receiving video buffers. > > Indeed there's an ambiguity there, although I always

Re: RFC: Power states and VIDIOC_STREAMON

Hi Devin, Em Wed, 19 Apr 2017 15:15:20 -0400 Devin Heitmueller escreveu: > Hello all, > > I'm in the process of putting together a bunch of long-standing fixes > for HVR-950q driver, and I ran into a regression related to the way > the video decoder is being

RFC: Power states and VIDIOC_STREAMON

Hello all, I'm in the process of putting together a bunch of long-standing fixes for HVR-950q driver, and I ran into a regression related to the way the video decoder is being managed. Before we dig into the details here's the general question: Should a user be able to interrogate video decoder