Hi Hans,
On Wednesday 27 March 2013 11:54:34 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Now that the VIDIOC_DBG_G_CHIP_NAME ioctl has been added to the v4l2 API I
> started work on removing the VIDIOC_DBG_G_CHIP_IDENT support in existing
> drivers. Based on that effort I realized that there are a few things that
> cou
Now that the VIDIOC_DBG_G_CHIP_NAME ioctl has been added to the v4l2 API I
started work on removing the VIDIOC_DBG_G_CHIP_IDENT support in existing
drivers. Based on that effort I realized that there are a few things that
could be improved.
One thing that Laurent pointed out is that this ioctl sho
