On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 12:32 AM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 1:12 AM, David Härdeman wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 01:40:34PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
So now that I'm more or less done with porting the imon dr
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 12:32 AM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 1:12 AM, David Härdeman wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 01:40:34PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
>>> So now that I'm more or less done with porting the imon driver, I
>>> think I'm ready to start tackling the mceusb dr
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 1:12 AM, David Härdeman wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 01:40:34PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
>> So now that I'm more or less done with porting the imon driver, I
>> think I'm ready to start tackling the mceusb driver. But I'm debating
>> on what approach to take with resp
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 5:23 PM, David Härdeman wrote:
> I don't care either way. Get the input maintainers to agree and I'll
> happily write patches that follow that approach (writing TX data to the
> input dev will also have to be supported).
>
> The only real problem I see is if we implement >
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 11:07:07AM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 10:15 AM, David Härdeman wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 08:35:48AM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> >> On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 1:22 AM, David Härdeman wrote:
> >> > I think we're eventually going to want to let rc-c
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 10:15 AM, David Härdeman wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 08:35:48AM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 1:22 AM, David Härdeman wrote:
>> > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 06:20:28PM -0400, Andy Walls wrote:
>> >> Not that my commit rate has been > 0 LOC lately, bu
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 08:35:48AM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 1:22 AM, David Härdeman wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 06:20:28PM -0400, Andy Walls wrote:
> >> Not that my commit rate has been > 0 LOC lately, but I'd like to see
> >> lirc_dev, just to get transmit worked o
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 1:22 AM, David Härdeman wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 06:20:28PM -0400, Andy Walls wrote:
>> Not that my commit rate has been > 0 LOC lately, but I'd like to see
>> lirc_dev, just to get transmit worked out for the CX23888 chip and
>> cx23885 driver.
>>
>> I think this d
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 06:20:28PM -0400, Andy Walls wrote:
> Not that my commit rate has been > 0 LOC lately, but I'd like to see
> lirc_dev, just to get transmit worked out for the CX23888 chip and
> cx23885 driver.
>
> I think this device will bring to light some assumptions LIRC currently
> ma
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 01:40:34PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> So now that I'm more or less done with porting the imon driver, I
> think I'm ready to start tackling the mceusb driver. But I'm debating
> on what approach to take with respect to lirc support. It sort of
> feels like we should have l
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 14:06 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> >
> > So now that I'm more or less done with porting the imon driver, I
> > think I'm ready to start tackling the mceusb driver. But I'm debating
> > on what approach to take with respect t
Jon Smirl wrote:
>> So now that I'm more or less done with porting the imon driver, I
>> think I'm ready to start tackling the mceusb driver. But I'm debating
>> on what approach to take with respect to lirc support. It sort of
>> feels like we should have lirc_dev ported as an ir "decoder"
>> driv
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 5:32 AM, David Härdeman wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 04:49:10PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 6:20 AM, David Härdeman wrote:
>>> > Porting the msmce driver to rc-core will be high on my lis
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 5:32 AM, David Härdeman wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 04:49:10PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 6:20 AM, David Härdeman wrote:
>> > Porting the msmce driver to rc-core will be high on my list of
>> > priorities once I've done some more changes to th
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 04:49:10PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 6:20 AM, David Härdeman wrote:
> > Porting the msmce driver to rc-core will be high on my list of
> > priorities once I've done some more changes to the API.
>
> Very cool. Though note that the latest lirc_mceu
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 6:20 AM, David Härdeman wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 09:44:12PM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
>> wrote:
>> > This series of 15 patches improves support for IR, as discussed at the
>> > "What are the goals for the archit
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 09:44:12PM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> wrote:
> > This series of 15 patches improves support for IR, as discussed at the
> > "What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system?"
> > thread.
> >
> > It bas
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
wrote:
> This series of 15 patches improves support for IR, as discussed at the
> "What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system?"
> thread.
>
> It basically adds a raw decoder layer at ir-core, allowing decoders to plug
> i
18 matches
Mail list logo
