On 12/27/2015 9:13 AM, Julia Lawall wrote:
Well, looking again, the patch should be good. I just thought its goal was
to fix the code as well...
I could do that for the irq < 0 case, but I think that in that case, kbuild
will only run the patch version, and the <= cases will not be
On Sun, 27 Dec 2015, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> On 12/26/2015 11:58 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
> > The error return value of platform_get_irq seems to often get dropped.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall
> >
> > ---
> >
> > v2: Check for the direct return case also.
On 12/27/2015 01:32 AM, Julia Lawall wrote:
The error return value of platform_get_irq seems to often get dropped.
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall
---
v2: Check for the direct return case also. Added some mailing lists of
common offenders.
diff --git
On 12/26/2015 11:58 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
The error return value of platform_get_irq seems to often get dropped.
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall
---
v2: Check for the direct return case also. Added some mailing lists of
common offenders.
diff --git
>Well, looking again, the patch should be good. I just thought its goal was
> to fix the code as well...
I could do that for the irq < 0 case, but I think that in that case, kbuild
will only run the patch version, and the <= cases will not be reported on.
I don't have a general fix for the <=