OK, I'm back to work after my vacation, so it's time to go through the
backlog...
On Tuesday, July 12, 2011 15:25:02 Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 07/04/2011 11:43 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Saturday, July 02, 2011 16:31:47 Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 07/02/2011 01:10 PM, Hans Verkuil
Hi,
On 07/26/2011 11:26 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
OK, I'm back to work after my vacation, so it's time to go through the
backlog...
Welcome back :)
On Tuesday, July 12, 2011 15:25:02 Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 07/04/2011 11:43 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
snip snip
It is relevant. Take an
On Tuesday, July 26, 2011 15:51:58 Hans de Goede wrote:
snip
OK, so we have two scenarios:
1) There is a manual setting which is constant until explicitly changed,
when e.g.
gain switches from auto mode to manual mode then the actual used gain is
reset to
this manual setting.
Hi,
On 07/26/2011 04:19 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Tuesday, July 26, 2011 15:51:58 Hans de Goede wrote:
snip
An open question is whether writing to an inactive and volatile control should
return
an error or not.
I would prefer an error return.
I am worried about backwards
On Saturday, July 02, 2011 16:31:47 Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 07/02/2011 01:10 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Saturday, July 02, 2011 12:28:35 Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
snip snip snip
Ok, thinking about this some more and reading Hans V's comments
I think that the current code in
On Saturday, July 02, 2011 02:55:10 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 01-07-2011 12:06, Hans de Goede escreveu:
Hi Hans (et all),
I've been working on doing a much needed cleanup to the pwc driver,
converting it to videobuf2 and using the new ctrl framework.
I hope to be able to send
Hi,
snip snip snip
Ok, thinking about this some more and reading Hans V's comments
I think that the current code in Hans V's core8c branch is fine,
and should go to 3.1 (rather then be delayed to 3.2).
As for the fundamental question what to do with foo
controls when autofoo goes from auto to
On Saturday, July 02, 2011 12:28:35 Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
snip snip snip
Ok, thinking about this some more and reading Hans V's comments
I think that the current code in Hans V's core8c branch is fine,
and should go to 3.1 (rather then be delayed to 3.2).
As for the fundamental
Hi,
On 07/02/2011 01:10 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Saturday, July 02, 2011 12:28:35 Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
snip snip snip
Ok, thinking about this some more and reading Hans V's comments
I think that the current code in Hans V's core8c branch is fine,
and should go to 3.1 (rather then be
Em 02-07-2011 06:36, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
On Saturday, July 02, 2011 02:55:10 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 01-07-2011 12:06, Hans de Goede escreveu:
Hi Hans (et all),
I've been working on doing a much needed cleanup to the pwc driver,
converting it to videobuf2 and using the new ctrl
Hi Hans (et all),
I've been working on doing a much needed cleanup to the pwc driver,
converting it to videobuf2 and using the new ctrl framework.
I hope to be able to send a pull request for this, this weekend.
I saw your pull request and I'm looking forward to be able to
play with ctrl
Em 01-07-2011 12:06, Hans de Goede escreveu:
Hi Hans (et all),
I've been working on doing a much needed cleanup to the pwc driver,
converting it to videobuf2 and using the new ctrl framework.
I hope to be able to send a pull request for this, this weekend.
I saw your pull request and
12 matches
Mail list logo
