On 19 December 2011 12:59, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> Hi Javier,
>
> On Monday 19 December 2011 12:01:34 javier Martin wrote:
>> On 19 December 2011 01:19, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> > On Thursday 15 December 2011 17:02:47 javier Martin wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >> we are testing a logitech Webcam M/N: V
Hi Javier,
On Monday 19 December 2011 12:01:34 javier Martin wrote:
> On 19 December 2011 01:19, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Thursday 15 December 2011 17:02:47 javier Martin wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> we are testing a logitech Webcam M/N: V-U0012 in the UVC tree (commit
> >> ef7728797039bb6a20f22cc2d
On 19 December 2011 01:19, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> Hi Javier,
>
> On Thursday 15 December 2011 17:02:47 javier Martin wrote:
>> Hi,
>> we are testing a logitech Webcam M/N: V-U0012 in the UVC tree (commit
>> ef7728797039bb6a20f22cc2d96ef72d9338cba0).
>> It is configured at 25fps, VGA.
>>
>> We'v
Hi Javier,
On Thursday 15 December 2011 17:02:47 javier Martin wrote:
> Hi,
> we are testing a logitech Webcam M/N: V-U0012 in the UVC tree (commit
> ef7728797039bb6a20f22cc2d96ef72d9338cba0).
> It is configured at 25fps, VGA.
>
> We've observed that the following debugging message appears someti
Hi,
we are testing a logitech Webcam M/N: V-U0012 in the UVC tree (commit
ef7728797039bb6a20f22cc2d96ef72d9338cba0).
It is configured at 25fps, VGA.
We've observed that the following debugging message appears sometimes
"Frame complete (FID bit toggled).". Whenever this happens a v4l2
frame is lost