dvb bug

With recent kernels I get system freeze when running with the following hardware: Intel DX58S02 motherboard Xeon W5520 cpu Hauppauge HVR-1700 PCIe DVB-T Technisat SkyStar2 DVB-T PCI card If I run either DVB-T card on its own then everything is ok. Or if I run both cards on differ

v4l-dvb bug report

Hi, I am a newbee so please be patient with me. I have followed all the instructions and I tried to compile the sources and got a lot of errors. I don't think it's my fault but i may be wrong. My system: Ubuntu 10.04 with kernel 2.6.32.22 I have the headers installed, not the full kernel source c

Re: v4l-dvb bug report

Hi Matteo, I had the same problem a while ago. Short answer, the firedtv driver needs full kernel source to compile. I think I ended up with the full kernel source for other reasons (you need full source if you are going to use make menuconfig/oldconfig/etc). But if make menuconfig and/or the fir

Re: v4l-dvb bug report

Yeah, thank you, I have found the FIREDTV=n trick on some other forum just a few minutes before I read your reply, and with that change it has compiled fine :) I'm not sure what firedtv is but I don't think I need it :) By the way may I ask a newbie question? If you need the kernel sources to com

Re: [Bulk] v4l-dvb bug report

Holy cow -- Ubuntu is still borked in regards to the firedtv stuff ?! What is that - something like 4 releases in a row now? Anyway, well known problem, have a look here: http://www.mail-archive.com/search?q=firedtv+Ubuntu&l=linux-media%40vger.kernel.org first link will give you the easy fix to

Re: [Bulk] Re: v4l-dvb bug report

matteo sisti sette wrote: > Yeah, thank you, I have found the FIREDTV=n trick on some other forum > just a few minutes before I read your reply, and with that change it > has compiled fine :) > oops, I just sent my reply before I saw that you already figured it out > I'm not sure what firedtv i

[linux-dvb] [bug] AF9015 message "WARNING: >>> tuning failed!!!"

I've a cheap USB DVB key that won't work with Kaffeine. It identifies itself as KWorld USB DVB-T TV Stick II (VS-DVB-T 395U). It shows up on Kaffeine's "Configure Television" dialog, but scanning for channels finds nothing, and tuning using an old channel list gives "Sorry - no available device fou

Re: [linux-dvb] [bug] AF9015 message "WARNING: >>> tuning failed!!!"

On Wednesday 06 October 2010 22:29:35 Antti Palosaari wrote: > On 10/06/2010 11:36 PM, dave cunningham wrote: > > In message <4cacd0f3.6030...@iki.fi>, Antti Palosaari wrote > > > >> It is QT1010 tuner driver issue. None is working for that currently or > >> in near future. Feel free to fix :] > >

Re: [linux-dvb] [bug] AF9015 message "WARNING: >>> tuning failed!!!"

On 11/23/2010 10:11 PM, Paul Gover wrote: On Wednesday 06 October 2010 22:29:35 Antti Palosaari wrote: On 10/06/2010 11:36 PM, dave cunningham wrote: In message<4cacd0f3.6030...@iki.fi>, Antti Palosaari wrote It is QT1010 tuner driver issue. None is working for that currently or in near futur

Re: [linux-dvb] [bug] AF9015 message "WARNING: >>> tuning failed!!!"

It is QT1010 tuner driver issue. None is working for that currently or in near future. Feel free to fix :] Antti On 10/06/2010 04:56 PM, Paul Gover wrote: I've a cheap USB DVB key that won't work with Kaffeine. It identifies itself as KWorld USB DVB-T TV Stick II (VS-DVB-T 395U). It shows up o

Re: [linux-dvb] [bug] AF9015 message "WARNING: >>> tuning failed!!!"

In message <4cacd0f3.6030...@iki.fi>, Antti Palosaari wrote It is QT1010 tuner driver issue. None is working for that currently or in near future. Feel free to fix :] The wiki appears to show this stick as working. . Is this information in

Re: [linux-dvb] [bug] AF9015 message "WARNING: >>> tuning failed!!!"

On 10/06/2010 11:36 PM, dave cunningham wrote: In message <4cacd0f3.6030...@iki.fi>, Antti Palosaari wrote It is QT1010 tuner driver issue. None is working for that currently or in near future. Feel free to fix :] The wiki appears to show this stick as working.

[HG PULL] http://linuxtv.org/hg/~awalls/v4l-dvb-bug

Mauro, Please pull from http://linuxtv.org/hg/~awalls/v4l-dvb-bug for the following 5 *high priority* changesets: 01/05: cx18: Rename snd_cx18_mixer_lock to snd_cx18_lock and increase visibility http://linuxtv.org/hg/~awalls/v4l-dvb-bug?cmd=changeset;node=5d28c157d0ef 02/05: cx18: Add missing

Re: [HG PULL] http://linuxtv.org/hg/~awalls/v4l-dvb-bug

Andy Walls wrote: > Mauro, > > Please pull from http://linuxtv.org/hg/~awalls/v4l-dvb-bug > > for the following 5 *high priority* changesets: Hmm... I don't think cx18 alsa code went to 2.3.33. That may explain why they got rejected at fixes.git tree: pulling from http://li

Re: [HG PULL] http://linuxtv.org/hg/~awalls/v4l-dvb-bug

On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 16:45 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Andy Walls wrote: > > Mauro, > > > > Please pull from http://linuxtv.org/hg/~awalls/v4l-dvb-bug > > > > for the following 5 *high priority* changesets: > > Hmm... I don't think cx18 al

Re: [HG PULL] http://linuxtv.org/hg/~awalls/v4l-dvb-bug

Andy Walls wrote: > On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 16:45 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: >> Andy Walls wrote: >>> Mauro, >>> >>> Please pull from http://linuxtv.org/hg/~awalls/v4l-dvb-bug >>> >>> for the following 5 *high priority* changesets: >&

Re: [linux-dvb] [BUG] changeset 9029 (http://linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb/rev/aa3e5cc1d833)

On Sun, 2009-02-15 at 13:36 +0100, Oliver Endriss wrote: > e9hack wrote: > > Hi, > > > > this change set is wrong. The affected functions cannot be called from an > > interrupt > > context, because they may process large buffers. In this case, interrupts > > are disabled for > > a long time. Fun

Re: [linux-dvb] [BUG] changeset 9029 (http://linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb/rev/aa3e5cc1d833)

On Sun, 2009-02-15 at 13:36 +0100, Oliver Endriss wrote: > e9hack wrote: > > Hi, > > > > this change set is wrong. The affected functions cannot be called from an > > interrupt > > context, because they may process large buffers. In this case, interrupts > > are disabled for > > a long time. Fun

Re: [linux-dvb] [BUG] changeset 9029 (http://linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb/rev/aa3e5cc1d833)

Why was this even committed in the first place being that it has such a horrible result?? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [linux-dvb] [BUG] changeset 9029 (http://linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb/rev/aa3e5cc1d833)

Hartmut, Oliver and Trent: Thanks for helping with this issue. I've just reverted the changeset. We still need a fix at dm1105, au0828-dvb and maybe other drivers that call the filtering routines inside IRQ's. Fix the demux, add a worker thread and allow drivers to call it directly. I'm not a b

Re: [linux-dvb] [BUG] changeset 9029 (http://linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb/rev/aa3e5cc1d833)

Steven Toth wrote: Hartmut, Oliver and Trent: Thanks for helping with this issue. I've just reverted the changeset. We still need a fix at dm1105, au0828-dvb and maybe other drivers that call the filtering routines inside IRQ's. Fix the demux, add a worker thread and allow drivers to call it

Re: [linux-dvb] [BUG] changeset 9029 (http://linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb/rev/aa3e5cc1d833)

On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 14:15 -0500, Steven Toth wrote: > Steven Toth wrote: > >> Hartmut, Oliver and Trent: Thanks for helping with this issue. I've just > >> reverted the changeset. We still need a fix at dm1105, au0828-dvb and > >> maybe > >> other drivers that call the filtering routines inside

Re: [linux-dvb] [BUG] changeset 9029 (http://linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb/rev/aa3e5cc1d833)

On Mon, 16 Feb 2009, Steven Toth wrote: > > Hartmut, Oliver and Trent: Thanks for helping with this issue. I've just > > reverted the changeset. We still need a fix at dm1105, au0828-dvb and maybe > > other drivers that call the filtering routines inside IRQ's. > > Fix the demux, add a worker threa

Re: [linux-dvb] [BUG] changeset 9029 (http://linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb/rev/aa3e5cc1d833)

Trent Piepho wrote: On Mon, 16 Feb 2009, Steven Toth wrote: Hartmut, Oliver and Trent: Thanks for helping with this issue. I've just reverted the changeset. We still need a fix at dm1105, au0828-dvb and maybe other drivers that call the filtering routines inside IRQ's. Fix the demux, add a work

Re: [linux-dvb] [BUG] changeset 9029 (http://linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb/rev/aa3e5cc1d833)

Steven Toth wrote: > A general question to the group: Who wants to volunteer to retro fit > videobuf_dvb into the current drivers so we can avoid calls to > sw_filter_...n() > directly? Can videobuf_dvb be used by hardware with MPEG decoders, too? My (probably not up-to-date) impression was tha

Re: [linux-dvb] [BUG] changeset 9029 (http://linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb/rev/aa3e5cc1d833)

Andreas Oberritter wrote: > Oliver Endriss wrote: > > ... > > @Andreas: > > Could you please explain in more detail what bad things might happen? > > To quote myself from the changelog: This fixes a deadlock discovered > by lockdep. I re-read the commit message, but it still does not ring any bel

Re: [linux-dvb] [BUG] changeset 9029 (http://linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb/rev/aa3e5cc1d833)

On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Steven Toth wrote: > Trent Piepho wrote: > > On Mon, 16 Feb 2009, Steven Toth wrote: > >>> Hartmut, Oliver and Trent: Thanks for helping with this issue. I've just > >>> reverted the changeset. We still need a fix at dm1105, au0828-dvb and > >>> maybe > >>> other drivers that

Re: [linux-dvb] [BUG] changeset 9029 (http://linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb/rev/aa3e5cc1d833)

On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Oliver Endriss wrote: > [1] If you want to lock a process against an interrupt handler, > - the process must use spin_lock_irq() > - the interrupt can use spin_lock() > > A routine has to use spin_lock_irqsave if (and only if) process and irq > call the routine concurrently. I

Re: [linux-dvb] [BUG] changeset 9029 (http://linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb/rev/aa3e5cc1d833)

Oliver Endriss wrote: > I re-read the commit message, but it still does not ring any bells. > Could you please post the lockdep output? No. I didn't save it. Regards, Andreas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kerne

Re: [linux-dvb] [BUG] changeset 9029 (http://linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb/rev/aa3e5cc1d833)

Trent Piepho wrote: On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Steven Toth wrote: Trent Piepho wrote: On Mon, 16 Feb 2009, Steven Toth wrote: Hartmut, Oliver and Trent: Thanks for helping with this issue. I've just reverted the changeset. We still need a fix at dm1105, au0828-dvb and maybe other drivers that call t

Re: [linux-dvb] [BUG] changeset 9029 (http://linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb/rev/aa3e5cc1d833)

Trent Piepho wrote: > On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Oliver Endriss wrote: > > [1] If you want to lock a process against an interrupt handler, > > - the process must use spin_lock_irq() > > - the interrupt can use spin_lock() > > > > A routine has to use spin_lock_irqsave if (and only if) process and irq > >

Re: [linux-dvb] [BUG] changeset 9029 (http://linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb/rev/aa3e5cc1d833)

On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Steven Toth wrote: > Trent Piepho wrote: > > On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Steven Toth wrote: > >> Trent Piepho wrote: > >>> On Mon, 16 Feb 2009, Steven Toth wrote: > Fixing the demux... Would this require and extra buffer copy? probably, > but it's > a trade-off between