> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:34:41PM -0500, david.hag...@gmail.com wrote:
>Even that won't always save you. In my area, we have 2 distinct signals,
>both identifying themselves as "KAKE-DT" on virtual channel 10.1, so even
>that isn't guaranteed to be unique.
Eh, what fun.
Technically, should jus
Even that won't always save you. In my area, we have 2 distinct signals,
both identifying themselves as "KAKE-DT" on virtual channel 10.1, so even
that isn't guaranteed to be unique.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vg
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 08:17:53AM +0100, tvboxspy wrote:
>On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 14:44 -0800, Roger wrote:
>> Can we get dvbscan to output the Channel Number into the final stdout
>> somehow?
>>
>> A likely format would be something such as the following.
>>
>> Current output:
>>
>> KATN-DT:4
On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 14:44 -0800, Roger wrote:
> Can we get dvbscan to output the Channel Number into the final stdout somehow?
>
> A likely format would be something such as the following.
>
> Current output:
>
> KATN-DT:497028615:8VSB:49:52:3
> KWFA-DT:497028615:8VSB:65:68:4
> ...
>
>
> Sug
Can we get dvbscan to output the Channel Number into the final stdout somehow?
A likely format would be something such as the following.
Current output:
KATN-DT:497028615:8VSB:49:52:3
KWFA-DT:497028615:8VSB:65:68:4
...
Suggested output:
2.1:497028615:8VSB:49:52:3
2.2:497028615:8VSB:65:68:4
...