Re: [PATCH v4] v4l/tvp514x: make the module aware of rich people

2009-02-21 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
* Sebastian Andrzej Siewior | 2009-02-10 20:30:39 [+0100]: because they might design two of those chips on a single board. You never know. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior bige...@linutronix.de --- v4: fix checkpatch issues I don't want to rush anything but is there any update on this?

Re: Minimum kernel version supported by v4l-dvb

2009-02-21 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi Mauro, Only answering points Hans didn't already answered (and I agree with him): On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:23:27 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:01:05 +0100 Jean Delvare kh...@linux-fr.org wrote: Not necessarily something to be proud about. This only shows how

RFCv1: v4l-dvb development models old kernel support

2009-02-21 Thread Hans Verkuil
RFC: v4l-dvb Development Models Version 1, February 21st 2009 --- Introduction The current v4l-dvb development model is based on a mercurial repository. Patches are fed into the repo by developers, the v4l-dvb maintainer will backport relevant patches

Re: RFCv1: v4l-dvb development models old kernel support

2009-02-21 Thread wk
Hans Verkuil wrote: Comments? Hans As only beeing reader of this list.., why not simply reduce the work load by - reducing the number of supported kernel versions to five major versions? Currently 2.6.28 would mean down to 2.6.23, this would be enough cover all nearly up-to-date

Re: [RFC] How to pass camera Orientation to userspace

2009-02-21 Thread Hans Verkuil
Hi Adam, Sorry for the late reply, it's been very busy. On Wednesday 18 February 2009 01:30:52 Adam Baker wrote: (linux-omap included in distribution as lots of omap systems include cameras so this could be relevant there.) Background A number of the webcams now supported by v4l have

Re: Minimum kernel version supported by v4l-dvb

2009-02-21 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 08:28:50 +0100 Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl wrote: On Saturday 21 February 2009 03:13:50 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 02:12:53 +0100 Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl wrote: I think that maybe we'll need some legacy-like support for bttv and

Re: Minimum kernel version supported by v4l-dvb

2009-02-21 Thread Trent Piepho
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 02:12:53 +0100 Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl wrote: I think that maybe we'll need some legacy-like support for bttv and cx88, since there are some boards that relies on the old i2c method to work. On those boards

Re: [linux-dvb] Can I use AVerTV Volar Black HD (A850) with Linux ?

2009-02-21 Thread Laurent Haond
Hi, I enabled debug on dvb-usb, here you can find my dmesg output : usb 4-3: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 12 usb 4-3: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice af9015_usb_probe: interface:0 af9015_read_config: IR mode:0 af9015_read_config: TS mode:1 af9015_read_config: [0]

Re: Minimum kernel version supported by v4l-dvb

2009-02-21 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Saturday 21 February 2009 12:58:01 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 08:28:50 +0100 Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl wrote: On Saturday 21 February 2009 03:13:50 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 02:12:53 +0100 Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl wrote:

Re: RFCv1: v4l-dvb development models old kernel support

2009-02-21 Thread Trent Piepho
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009, wk wrote: Hans Verkuil wrote: Comments? Hans As only beeing reader of this list.., why not simply reduce the work load by - reducing the number of supported kernel versions to five major versions? Currently 2.6.28 would mean down to 2.6.23, this would be

Re: Minimum kernel version supported by v4l-dvb

2009-02-21 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 13:45:40 +0100 Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl wrote: tda9840 support is provided by tda9840.ko, but there's no request_module() or any other reference (except for the above comment) to it at bttv driver. I believe that this is not an isolated case. The tda9840 is

Re: Minimum kernel version supported by v4l-dvb

2009-02-21 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 04:06:53 -0800 (PST) Trent Piepho xy...@speakeasy.org wrote: On Fri, 20 Feb 2009, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 02:12:53 +0100 Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl wrote: I think that maybe we'll need some legacy-like support for bttv and cx88,

Re: Minimum kernel version supported by v4l-dvb

2009-02-21 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi Trent, On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 04:06:53 -0800 (PST), Trent Piepho wrote: On Fri, 20 Feb 2009, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 02:12:53 +0100 Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl wrote: That's what the i2c_new_probed_device() call is for (called through

G_STD on radio devices

2009-02-21 Thread Hans Verkuil
Hi Mauro, I was playing with a radio-only device yesterday when I noticed that it somehow implemented G_STD. It turns out to be a side-effect of the G_STD implementation in v4l2-ioctl.c: case VIDIOC_G_STD: { v4l2_std_id *id = arg; ret = 0;

Re: Minimum kernel version supported by v4l-dvb

2009-02-21 Thread Jean Delvare
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 14:28:31 +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote: On Saturday 21 February 2009 14:11:30 Jean Delvare wrote: Well, that's basically what Hans has been doing with v4l2-i2c-drv-legacy.h for months now, isn't it? This is the easy part (even though even this wasn't exactly trivial...)

Re: Minimum kernel version supported by v4l-dvb

2009-02-21 Thread Trent Piepho
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009, Jean Delvare wrote: On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 04:06:53 -0800 (PST), Trent Piepho wrote: The new i2c driver interface also supports a -detect() method and a list of address_data to use it with. This is much more like the legacy model than using i2c_new_probed_device().

Re: Minimum kernel version supported by v4l-dvb

2009-02-21 Thread Jean Delvare
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 13:45:40 +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote: On Saturday 21 February 2009 12:58:01 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 08:28:50 +0100 Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl wrote: OK, once more: there are two types of legacy code: one is that drivers have to be switched

Re: Minimum kernel version supported by v4l-dvb

2009-02-21 Thread hermann pitton
Hi, just a short confirmation for cx88xx cards with external audio decoders. Am Samstag, den 21.02.2009, 09:56 -0300 schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab: On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 13:45:40 +0100 Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl wrote: tda9840 support is provided by tda9840.ko, but there's no

Re: [linuxtv-commits] [hg:v4l-dvb] Fix I2C bridge error in zl10353

2009-02-21 Thread Antti Palosaari
Hello, This patch breaks devices using tuner behind zl10353 i2c-gate. au6610: Sigmatek DVB-110 DVB-T USB2.0 gl861: MSI Mega Sky 55801 DVB-T USB2.0 A-LINK DTU DVB-T USB2.0 Probably some other too. I think it is better to disable i2c-gate setting callback to NULL after demod attach like dtv5100

[cron job] ERRORS: armv5 armv5-ixp armv5-omap2 i686 m32r mips powerpc64 x86_64 v4l-dvb build

2009-02-21 Thread Hans Verkuil
(This message is generated daily by a cron job that builds v4l-dvb for the kernels and architectures in the list below.) Results of the daily build of v4l-dvb: date:Sat Feb 21 19:00:05 CET 2009 path:http://www.linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb changeset: 10653:359d95e1d541 gcc version:

Re: Minimum kernel version supported by v4l-dvb

2009-02-21 Thread Jean Delvare
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 10:42:17 -0600 (CST), kilg...@banach.math.auburn.edu wrote: This is not exactly what I was trying to say. I'll try again. 1. Anyone who would call himself a developer will run quite recent kernels without being forced to do so, voluntarily and with pleasure. 2.

[PULL] http://www.linuxtv.org/hg/~hverkuil/v4l-dvb-usbvision

2009-02-21 Thread Hans Verkuil
Hi Mauro, Please pull from http://www.linuxtv.org/hg/~hverkuil/v4l-dvb-usbvision for the following: - v4l2-common: add v4l2_i2c_subdev_addr() - usbvision: convert to v4l2_device/v4l2_subdev. Thanks, Hans diffstat: drivers/media/video/usbvision/usbvision-core.c |2

[PULL] http://www.linuxtv.org/hg/~hverkuil/v4l-dvb-fill-std

2009-02-21 Thread Hans Verkuil
Hi Mauro, Please pull from http://www.linuxtv.org/hg/~hverkuil/v4l-dvb-fill-std for the following: - v4l2-common: remove v4l2_ctrl_query_fill_std Thanks, Hans diffstat: drivers/media/video/cx18/cx18-av-core.c |7 - drivers/media/video/cx2341x.c | 108

Re: RFCv1: v4l-dvb development models old kernel support

2009-02-21 Thread hermann pitton
Hi, Am Samstag, den 21.02.2009, 23:47 + schrieb Adam Baker: On Saturday 21 February 2009, Hans Verkuil wrote: The high rate of changes and new drivers means that keeping up the backwards compatibility becomes an increasingly heavy burden. This leads to two questions: 1) Can we

Re: RFCv1: v4l-dvb development models old kernel support

2009-02-21 Thread kilgota
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009, Adam Baker wrote: On Saturday 21 February 2009, Hans Verkuil wrote: The high rate of changes and new drivers means that keeping up the backwards compatibility becomes an increasingly heavy burden. This leads to two questions: 1) Can we change our development model in

[PULL] http://linuxtv.org/hg/~awalls/cx18

2009-02-21 Thread Andy Walls
Mauro, Please pull from: http://linuxtv.org/hg/~awalls/cx18 for the following: cx18: Disable AC3 controls as the firmware doesn't support AC3 cx18: Increment version number due to significant changes for v4l2_subdevs cx18: Get rid of unused variables related to video output cx18: Change log

cx24116 roll-off factor = auto

2009-02-21 Thread Goga777
Hi does support cx24116 the roll-off factor = auto ? Goga -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html