bindings to a release? I've dropped the patches related to LED naming and
> label property as the discusion appears to continue on that.
No problem. One question - isn't patch 3/4 missing?
Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski
> Thanks.
>
>
> since v2:
>
> - Drop patches rela
On 09/20/2017 10:53 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:01:02PM +0200, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>> Hi Pavel,
>>
>> On 09/18/2017 10:54 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
>>> On Mon 2017-09-18 17:49:23, Sakari Ailus wrote:
>>>> Hi Pavel,
>>>>
Hi Sakari,
On 09/22/2017 11:25 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Jacek,
>
> (Fixed DT list address.)
>
> Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>> Hi Sakari,
>>
>> On 09/22/2017 11:32 AM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
>>> Hi Jacek and others,
>>>
>>> Here are a
On 09/22/2017 11:07 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> On 09/20/2017 10:53 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:01:02PM +0200, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>>> Hi Pavel,
>>>
>>> On 09/18/2017 10:54 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
>>>> On Mon 2017-09
---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n950-n9.dtsi | 10 +---
> drivers/leds/leds-as3645a.c| 28
> +++---
> 3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
Acked-by: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszew...@gmail.com>
--
Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski
linux-leds list on cc when touching areas
related to LED/flash devices?
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski
On 09/08/2017 03:18 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Switch the as3645a from OF to the fwnode property API. Also add ACPI
> support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailu
is. LED class device name pattern
is well defined to devicename:colour:function
(see Documentation/leds/leds-class.txt, "LED Device Naming" section).
In this case "flash" in place of the "function" segment makes the
things clear enough I suppose.
--
Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski
Hi Sakari,
On 09/09/2017 11:36 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Jacek,
>
> On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 09:06:41PM +0200, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>> Hi Sakari,
>>
>> I've come across this patch only by a chance. I believe that merging
>> leds-as3645a.c pa
Hi Sakari,
On 08/21/2017 03:53 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Jacek,
>
> Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>> Hi Sakari,
>>
>> Thanks for the update.
>> I've noticed that you added node labels to the child device nodes
>> in [0]:
>>
>> "a
nst the
approach I proposed in the previous review?:
snprintf(names->flash, sizeof(names->flash),
AS_NAME":%s", node->name);
Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski
On 08/19/2017 11:42 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ai...@iki.fi>
>
&g
Forgot to add a link to the referenced patch:
[0] http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg191273.html
On 08/20/2017 12:09 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> Hi Sakari,
>
> Thanks for the update.
> I've noticed that you added node labels to the child device nodes
> in [0]:
>
our' DT property as a solution?
Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski
On 09/23/2017 11:12 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> On 09/22/2017 11:07 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>> On 09/20/2017 10:53 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:01:02PM +0200, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>&g
EXYNOS3250_JPGINTST);
> }
>
> unsigned int exynos3250_jpeg_operating(void __iomem *regs)
>
Reviewed-by: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszew...@gmail.com>
--
Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski
701 - 713 of 713 matches
Mail list logo
