[PATCH 1/8] s3c6410: sdhci: Adding additional elements in sdhci platform data structure.

2009-09-07 Thread thomas . ab
From: Thomas Abraham This patch adds additional elements in the s3c6410 sdhci platform data structure. The elements added are parent clock name, source clock name and desired clock speed. Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham --- arch/arm/plat-s3c/include/plat/sdhci.h |3 +++ 1 files changed, 3 in

[PATCH 2/8] s3c6410: sdhci: Adding additional data in sdhci platform data structure.

2009-09-07 Thread thomas . ab
From: Thomas Abraham This patch adds additional information about the parent clock name, sdhci clock name and desired sdhci operating frequency in the sdhci platform data structure. Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham --- arch/arm/plat-s3c/dev-hsmmc.c |9 ++--- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(

[PATCH 0/8] s3c6410: sdhci: Update Samsung 6410 SDHCI driver.

2009-09-07 Thread thomas . ab
From: Thomas Abraham This patch series updates Samsung's 6410 SDHCI driver. This patch series adds clock configuration code in the sdhci driver, adds ADMA support and adds module exit functionality. This patch set includes the following patches [PATCH 1/8] s3c6410: sdhci: Adding additional elem

[PATCH] sdhci: Add new quirk in sdhci driver and update ADMA descriptor build.

2009-09-07 Thread thomas . ab
From: Thomas Abraham The s3c6410 sdhci controller does not support the 'End' attribute and NOP attribute in the same 8-Byte ADMA descriptor. This patch adds a new quirk to identify sdhci host contollers with such behaviour. In addition to this, for controllers using the new quirk, the last entry

[PATCH 4/4] s3c6410: Remove redundant mpll parent assignment.

2009-09-07 Thread thomas . ab
From: Thomas Abraham This patch removes the redundant MPLL parent assignment in the function s3c6400_register_clocks. Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham --- arch/arm/plat-s3c64xx/s3c6400-clock.c |1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-s3c64xx/s3c6400-c

[PATCH 3/4] s3c6410: Fix divider value calculation in s3c64xx_roundrate_clksrc

2009-09-07 Thread thomas . ab
From: Thomas Abraham In s3c64xx_roundrate_clksrc function, the calculation is wrong. This patch fixes this calculation. Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham --- arch/arm/plat-s3c64xx/s3c6400-clock.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-s3c64xx/s3c640

[PATCH 2/4] s3c6410: update clk->parent when setting clock source

2009-09-07 Thread thomas . ab
From: Thomas Abraham This ensures the clock hierarchy data structures are updated when we change the clock source in the actual hardware registers. Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham --- arch/arm/plat-s3c64xx/s3c6400-clock.c |2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/

[PATCH 1/4] s3c6410: use correct divider_shift in setrate_clksrc()

2009-09-07 Thread thomas . ab
From: Thomas Abraham In s3c64xx_setrate_clksrc() we used sclk->shift, but actually need to use sclk->divider_shift to correctly calculate the value for the divider register. Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham --- arch/arm/plat-s3c64xx/s3c6400-clock.c |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2

[PATCH 0/4] s3c6410: Samsung 6410 clock configuration fixes.

2009-09-07 Thread thomas . ab
From: Thomas Abraham This patch series fixes issues in the Samsung's 6410 clock configuration code. These patches are required for the correct functioning of the s3c6410 SDHCI driver. The following patches are included in this patch series. [PATCH 1/4] s3c6410: use correct divider_shift in set

Re: BUG? a suspected race bug at sdio_irq_thread()

2009-09-07 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Mon, 7 Sep 2009, 홍신 shin hong wrote: > sdio_irq_therad() is spawned as a sdio_card_irq_get(). > This thread is stopped by sdio_card_irq_put(). > > sdio_irq_thread() finishes its do-while iteration > when kthread_should_stop() returns true > or a condition is satisfied (break statements at line

Re: [PATCH 1/4] [MMC] core SDIO suspend/resume support

2009-09-07 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Sun, 6 Sep 2009, Pierre Ossman wrote: > On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 14:37:23 -0400 > Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > > > When resuming, we make sure the same card is still inserted by comparing > > the vendor and product IDs. If there is a mismatch, or if there is simply > > no card anymore in the slot,

Re: [PATCH RFC 1/3] sdio: recognize io card without powercycle

2009-09-07 Thread Ehud Gavron
Michael Buesch wrote: On Monday 07 September 2009 20:59:45 Chris Ball wrote: Hi Michael, > Please submit this to the SDIO maintainer. MULTIMEDIA CARD (MMC), SECURE DIGITAL (SD) AND SDIO SUBSYSTEM S: Orphan L: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org F: drivers/mmc/ F: include/linux/mmc/ So, thes

Re: [PATCH RFC 1/3] sdio: recognize io card without powercycle

2009-09-07 Thread Michael Buesch
On Monday 07 September 2009 20:59:45 Chris Ball wrote: > Hi Michael, > >> Please submit this to the SDIO maintainer. > > MULTIMEDIA CARD (MMC), SECURE DIGITAL (SD) AND SDIO SUBSYSTEM > S: Orphan > L: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org > F: drivers/mmc/ > F: include/linux/mmc/ > > So, these patche

Re: [PATCH RFC 1/3] sdio: recognize io card without powercycle

2009-09-07 Thread Chris Ball
Hi Michael, > Please submit this to the SDIO maintainer. MULTIMEDIA CARD (MMC), SECURE DIGITAL (SD) AND SDIO SUBSYSTEM S: Orphan L: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org F: drivers/mmc/ F: include/linux/mmc/ So, these patches are in the right place. - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child --

Re: [PATCH RFC 2/3] sdio: pass unknown cis tuples to sdio drivers

2009-09-07 Thread Michael Buesch
On Monday 07 September 2009 20:47:12 Albert Herranz wrote: > > Please also submit to the SDIO maintainer. -- Greetings, Michael. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vg

Re: [PATCH RFC 1/3] sdio: recognize io card without powercycle

2009-09-07 Thread Michael Buesch
On Monday 07 September 2009 20:46:58 Albert Herranz wrote: > > Please submit this to the SDIO maintainer. -- Greetings, Michael. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vg

[PATCH RFC 2/3] sdio: pass unknown cis tuples to sdio drivers

2009-09-07 Thread Albert Herranz
From bb888461dceb85e43b9c1fc9559f012dfeb19688 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Albert Herranz Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 21:24:11 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] sdio: pass unknown cis tuples to sdio drivers Some manufactures provide vendor information in non-vendor specific CIS tuples. For example, Br

[PATCH RFC 1/3] sdio: recognize io card without powercycle

2009-09-07 Thread Albert Herranz
From 5c97462ae9188524faa0c57fa8b5bf8e9e0c125c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Albert Herranz Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 21:06:32 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] sdio: recognize io card without powercycle SDIO Simplified Specification (at least V2.00) states that it is strongly recommended that the hos

Re: [PATCH 0/4] s3c6410: Samsung 6410 clock configuration fixes.

2009-09-07 Thread Ben Dooks
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 09:25:11PM +0900, Thomas Abraham wrote: > This patch series fixes issues in the Samsung's 6410 clock configuration > code. These patches are required for the correct functioning of the > s3c6410 SDHCI driver. The following patches are included in this > patch series. > >

Re: Regression in suspend to ram in 2.6.31-rc kernels

2009-09-07 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > >>> Note that when you rever this patch on a current kernel you do actually > >>> get different behvaviour than when going back to before this commit. > >>> > >>> In 2.6.30 we called ->write_super in the various sync functions and > >>> then ->sync_fs, in 2.6.31-rc8 you would not call any sy

BUG? a suspected race bug at sdio_irq_thread()

2009-09-07 Thread 홍신 shin hong
Hello. I am reporting a suspected race bug at sdio_irq_thread() in drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c of Linux 2.6.30.5. I hope this report is helpful. I am not certain whether this reports real bug or not since I do not have much background. So, please examine the report and let me know your opinion. s

Re: MMC retry mechanism

2009-09-07 Thread Adrian Hunter
Madhusudhan wrote: Hi Adrian, With respect to the below commit, It looks like currently the retry mechanism only handles the READ path. I wonder could a similar retry logic feasible for the WRITE path? Regards, Madhu From my point of view, writes should never fail. In theory, the MMC shou