Pierre,
Thanks for the information.
And what I understood from MMCA specification is that -
EXT_CSD_REV: Defines the fixed parameters. related to the EXT_CSD, according to
its revision. Nothing to do with MMCA specification version or > 4GB card.
SO, I need just one more help from you to brows
On Mon 2009-09-14 10:39:44, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> 2009/9/12 Rafael J. Wysocki :
> > On Saturday 12 September 2009, Chris Ball wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> > Well system could check basic card ids if they match after resume
> >>
> >> No. That (arguably) guarantees that it's the same card, but not
On Mon 2009-09-14 22:05:10, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 23:51:17 +0200
> Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> > On Fri 2009-09-11 23:45:01, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> > >
> > > Well system could check basic card ids if they match after resume - if
> > > some users wants to crash his card by rando
On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 23:51:17 +0200
Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Fri 2009-09-11 23:45:01, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> >
> > Well system could check basic card ids if they match after resume - if
> > some users wants to crash his card by randomly swapping it during
> > suspend/resume - I'd have no problem
On Mon, 7 Sep 2009 20:55:58 +0200
Michael Buesch wrote:
> On Monday 07 September 2009 20:47:12 Albert Herranz wrote:
> >
> >
>
> Please also submit to the SDIO maintainer.
>
There isn't one anymore, so submitting to this list is the correct
method.
Rgds
--
-- Pierre Ossman
WA
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:34:35 +0530
"Ghorai, Sukumar" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am working in Linux MMC driver.
> Recently I came across one 16GB MMC card where EXT_CSD Register having
> EXT_CSD_REV[192] field as ZERO, which is valid according to Specification.
> But card is not working due to foll
On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 12:58:54 -0500
"Madhusudhan" wrote:
> Okay. Thanks for the info. I would like to read those discussions and the
> patches, any reference? Or where do I look for them and any good way to
> search such threads in general?
>
The subjects have been a bit unclear unfortunately, bu
On Monday 14 September 2009, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> 2009/9/12 Rafael J. Wysocki :
> > On Saturday 12 September 2009, Chris Ball wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>> Well system could check basic card ids if they match after resume
> >>
> >> No. That (arguably) guarantees that it's the same card, but no
2009/9/12 Rafael J. Wysocki :
> On Saturday 12 September 2009, Chris Ball wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> > Well system could check basic card ids if they match after resume
>>
>> No. That (arguably) guarantees that it's the same card, but not that
>> it wasn't modified in another machine during the suspen
