+ sdhci-increase-timeout-for-internal-clock-stabilization.patch added to -mm tree

2009-09-18 Thread akpm
The patch titled sdhci: increase timeout for internal clock stabilization. has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is sdhci-increase-timeout-for-internal-clock-stabilization.patch Before you just go and hit "reply", please: a) Consider who else should be cc'ed b) Prefer to c

[PATCH] sdhci: Increase timeout for internal clock stabilization.

2009-09-18 Thread Chris Ball
On an OLPC XO-1.5 development board with Via VX855 chipset, the sdhci controller can take up to 12ms to stabilize its clock, but the current timeout at which we give up on the controller is 10ms. The patch increases the timeout delay rather than using a device-specific quirk -- since we exit the l

+ sdhci-support-for-adma-only-hosts.patch added to -mm tree

2009-09-18 Thread akpm
The patch titled sdhci: support for ADMA only hosts has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is sdhci-support-for-adma-only-hosts.patch Before you just go and hit "reply", please: a) Consider who else should be cc'ed b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well c) Ideal

Re: Regression in suspend to ram in 2.6.31-rc kernels

2009-09-18 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday 18 September 2009, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote: > "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes: > > > On Saturday 12 September 2009, Chris Ball wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >>> Well system could check basic card ids if they match after resume > >> > >> No. That (arguably) guarantees that it's the same card, bu

Re: Regression in suspend to ram in 2.6.31-rc kernels

2009-09-18 Thread OGAWA Hirofumi
"Rafael J. Wysocki" writes: > On Saturday 12 September 2009, Chris Ball wrote: >> Hi, >> >>> Well system could check basic card ids if they match after resume >> >> No. That (arguably) guarantees that it's the same card, but not that >> it wasn't modified in another machine during the susp