I try to get sound and SD card working on at91sam9g45-ekes development
board using linux-next tree. As far as I understand AT_HDMAC is the
appropriate DMA driver for ARCH_AT91SAM9G45.
Correct.
I resolved dependencies with this patch, so I could activate it for
my platform.
---
Hi Linus,
You changes cause the bcmring platform to fail to compile.
Can you go through all the ARM platforms and make the
necessary adjustments with the change in header files
for mmc?
Thanks,
Scott
-Original Message-
From: linux-arm-kernel-boun...@lists.infradead.org
From: Ohad Ben-Cohen o...@wizery.com
To allow the usage of MMC_VDD_165_195, host capability
MMC_CAP_VDD_165_195 is introduced. This is necessary
because MMC_VDD_165_195 is currently reserved/undefined.
Signed-off-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen o...@wizery.com
---
drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c |7 +++
[resending due to mailer issues - sorry]
---
From: Ohad Ben-Cohen o...@wizery.com
To allow the usage of MMC_VDD_165_195, host capability
MMC_CAP_VDD_165_195 is introduced. This is necessary
because MMC_VDD_165_195 is currently reserved/undefined.
Signed-off-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen o...@wizery.com
---
[I should really ditch my mailer, I know. hope it's the last attempt. Sorry x 2]
---
From: Ohad Ben-Cohen o...@wizery.com
To allow the usage of MMC_VDD_165_195, host capability
MMC_CAP_VDD_165_195 is introduced. This is necessary
because MMC_VDD_165_195 is currently reserved/undefined.
Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
From: Ohad Ben-Cohen o...@wizery.com
To allow the usage of MMC_VDD_165_195, host capability
MMC_CAP_VDD_165_195 is introduced. This is necessary
because MMC_VDD_165_195 is currently reserved/undefined.
The host already reports what voltages it supports (in
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 10:11:29AM -0700, Scott Branden wrote:
Hi Linus,
You changes cause the bcmring platform to fail to compile.
Can you go through all the ARM platforms and make the
necessary adjustments with the change in header files
for mmc?
Since Linus's change has been merged,
2009/9/28 Scott Branden sbran...@broadcom.com:
You changes cause the bcmring platform to fail to compile.
The noes! Patch mailed.
Can you go through all the ARM platforms and make the
necessary adjustments with the change in header files
for mmc?
I think bcmring was the only one, I missed
Hi David,
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 8:09 PM, David Vrabel david.vra...@csr.com wrote:
...
That's a fair amount of work so perhaps in the interim something like this:
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c
@@ -494,6 +494,9 @@ int mmc_attach_sdio(struct mmc_host *host, u32
Hi Matt,
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Matt Fleming m...@console-pimps.org wrote:
Have you got patches that add this capability to the TI 127x and ZOOM2
board setup files?
Sure, but I planned on waiting for the discussion on this to conclude.
Seems like it is moot now.
Thanks,
Ohad.
--
To
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:10:48 +0100
Matt Fleming m...@console-pimps.org wrote:
+ if ((ocr MMC_VDD_165_195) !(host-caps MMC_CAP_VDD_165_195)) {
+ printk(KERN_WARNING %s: SDIO card claims to support the
+ incompletely defined 'low voltage range'. This
+
The patch titled
sdio: add MMC_CAP_VDD_165_195 host capability
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
sdio-add-mmc_cap_vdd_165_195-host-capability.patch
Before you just go and hit reply, please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing
a...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
--
Subject: sdio: pass whitelisted cis funce tuples to sdio drivers
From: Albert Herranz albert_herr...@yahoo.es
Some manufacturers provide vendor information in non-vendor specific CIS
tuples. For
Hi folks,
The commit 8dfd0374be84793360db7fff2e635d2cd3bbcb21 is causing one of
my MMC cards to fail to initialise.
Has anyone else seen initialisation failures since this patch?
I suspect the problem is in tmio-mmc but its a weird one - only one of
my two tc6393xb based hosts has this issue,
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:09:52 +0100
David Vrabel david.vra...@csr.com wrote:
Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
From: Ohad Ben-Cohen o...@wizery.com
To allow the usage of MMC_VDD_165_195, host capability
MMC_CAP_VDD_165_195 is introduced. This is necessary
because MMC_VDD_165_195 is currently
*prod*
After all the fuss about this, no-ones going to comment?
I just found the last tmio-related bug I want to squash before I
consider this patchset 'good to go' so people actually updatinng their
drivers / sending me code would be much appreciated. I'd prefer this
went in with all the
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 03:59:00PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:10:48 +0100
Matt Fleming m...@console-pimps.org wrote:
+ if ((ocr MMC_VDD_165_195) !(host-caps MMC_CAP_VDD_165_195)) {
+ printk(KERN_WARNING %s: SDIO card claims to support the
+
17 matches
Mail list logo
