Hi, Peter.
First of all, Thanks for the commenting.
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 5:47 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 21:51 +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
>> I think it's because mempool reserves memory.
>> (# of I/O issue\0 is hard to be expected.
>> How do we determine mempool size of
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 21:51 +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> I think it's because mempool reserves memory.
> (# of I/O issue\0 is hard to be expected.
> How do we determine mempool size of each block driver?
> For example, maybe, server use few I/O for nand.
> but embedded system uses a lot of I/O.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:11:43PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 08:52:54 +0100
> Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>
> I think it was Ben that suggested once to introduce a HAVE_SDHCI_S3C
> symbol, selected by interested parties (S3C, S5P, S5PC...).
Yes, I did mention this and it is an
Sorry for the noise.
While I am typing, my mail client already send the mail. :(.
This is genuine.
KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:17:50 +0900 (JST)
>> KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>>
>>> Non MM subsystem must not use PF_MEMALLOC. Memory reclaim need few
>>> memory, anyone must not pr
> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:17:50 +0900 (JST)
> KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>
> > Non MM subsystem must not use PF_MEMALLOC. Memory reclaim need few
> > memory, anyone must not prevent it. Otherwise the system cause
> > mysterious hang-up and/or OOM Killer invokation.
>
> So now what happens if we are p
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 08:52:54 +0100
Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> From: Kyungmin Park
>
> Samsung S5PC100 SoC has SDHCI controller compatible to the one known
> from S3C64xx SoCs. Enable support for sdhci-s3c driver also on
> S5PC1xx platform.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
> Signed-off-by: Mare
Am Dienstag, 17. November 2009 11:32:36 schrieb Minchan Kim:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:17:50 +0900 (JST)
> >
> > KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> >> Non MM subsystem must not use PF_MEMALLOC. Memory reclaim need few
> >> memory, anyone must not prevent
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:17:50 +0900 (JST)
> KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>
>> Non MM subsystem must not use PF_MEMALLOC. Memory reclaim need few
>> memory, anyone must not prevent it. Otherwise the system cause
>> mysterious hang-up and/or OOM Killer in
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:17:50 +0900 (JST)
KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> Non MM subsystem must not use PF_MEMALLOC. Memory reclaim need few
> memory, anyone must not prevent it. Otherwise the system cause
> mysterious hang-up and/or OOM Killer invokation.
So now what happens if we are paging and all ou
From: Kyungmin Park
Samsung S5PC100 SoC has SDHCI controller compatible to the one known from
S3C64xx SoCs. Enable support for sdhci-s3c driver also on S5PC1xx platform.
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski
Acked-by: Ben Dooks
---
drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig |2 +-
1
10 matches
Mail list logo