On 09/27/2010 04:47 AM, zhangfei gao wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Wolfram Sang w.s...@pengutronix.de wrote:
The custom init call may need more data to perform its job, so we pass it a
pointer to the platform_data, too. Now, for drivers extending sdhci-pltfm
(like
Hello,
On Sunday, September 26, 2010 12:53 AM Chris Ball wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:08:03PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
The patch applies OK to 2.6.35. Is the bug present there as well? If
so, should we fix it in earlier kernels? If so then the way in which
we indicate this is
Hi Tony,
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 6:08 AM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
* kishore kadiyala kishore.kadiy...@ti.com [100924 10:05]:
Adding card detect callback function and card detect configuration
function for MMC1 Controller on OMAP4.
Card detect configuration function does initial
Cc: Samuel Ortiz sa...@linux.intel.com
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:43 PM, kishore kadiyala
kishore.kadiy...@ti.com wrote:
Adding card detect callback function and card detect configuration
function for MMC1 Controller on OMAP4.
Card detect configuration function does initial configuration of
Chris, I've rebased this mmc_assume_removable patch series against
mmc-next and fixed up the compilation breakage with allmodconfig.
Note, I've left your Signed-off-by on Jaehoon's patch because you
modified the patch slightly (and because it's going through your tree
anyway). I hope that's OK.
From: Jaehoon Chung jh80.ch...@samsung.com
When a controller requires SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION, we poll
for card insertion/removal, and that creates interrupts. There's no
need to be doing this if we have a non-removable card.
This patch requires cards to be removable before we're
There are two checks that need to be made when determining whether a
card is removable. A host controller may set MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE if the
controller does not support removing cards (e.g. eMMC), in which case
the card is physically non-removable. Also the 'mmc_assume_removable'
module parameter
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 03:31:22PM +0800, zhangfei gao wrote:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Matt Fleming m...@console-pimps.org wrote:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 03:20:08AM +0100, Chris Ball wrote:
Hi Matt,
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 09:38:55PM +0100, Chris Ball wrote:
On Wed, Sep 15,
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 09:42:19AM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
There are two checks that need to be made when determining whether a
card is removable. A host controller may set MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE if the
controller does not support removing cards (e.g. eMMC), in which case
the card is
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 09:42:20AM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
From: Jaehoon Chung jh80.ch...@samsung.com
When a controller requires SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION, we poll
for card insertion/removal, and that creates interrupts. There's no
need to be doing this if we have a non-removable
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:14:24AM +0200, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote:
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Cavallaro peppe.cavall...@st.com
I'd prefer it the way sdhci-mv.c is doing it (just one #if-block and
returning the code from the sdhci_*-functions). Then it should be fine.
---
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:14:25AM +0200, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote:
Some platforms based on the shdci-pltfm device driver need to
set own quirks (that currently are in drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h).
This patch splits this header file in two parts:
o drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
it includes
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:14:26AM +0200, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote:
This patch fixes a warning when compile the sdhci:
pwr may be used uninitialized in sdhci_set_power
Also removes some include files that live in sdhci.h
header file.
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Cavallaro
Hi Wolfram,
On 09/27/2010 12:54 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:14:26AM +0200, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote:
This patch fixes a warning when compile the sdhci:
pwr may be used uninitialized in sdhci_set_power
Also removes some include files that live in sdhci.h
header file.
Hi Wolfram,
On 09/27/2010 12:43 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:14:25AM +0200, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote:
Some platforms based on the shdci-pltfm device driver need to
set own quirks (that currently are in drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h).
This patch splits this header file in two
On 09/27/2010 12:37 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:14:24AM +0200, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote:
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Cavallaro peppe.cavall...@st.com
I'd prefer it the way sdhci-mv.c is doing it (just one #if-block and
returning the code from the sdhci_*-functions). Then
On 09/27/2010 02:57 PM, Peppe CAVALLARO wrote:
On 09/27/2010 12:37 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:14:24AM +0200, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote:
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Cavallaro peppe.cavall...@st.com
I'd prefer it the way sdhci-mv.c is doing it (just one #if-block and
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 02:57:50PM +0200, Peppe CAVALLARO wrote:
Hi Wolfram,
On 09/27/2010 12:43 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:14:25AM +0200, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote:
Some platforms based on the shdci-pltfm device driver need to
set own quirks (that currently are in
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 03:24:02PM +0200, Peppe CAVALLARO wrote:
On 09/27/2010 02:57 PM, Peppe CAVALLARO wrote:
On 09/27/2010 12:37 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:14:24AM +0200, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote:
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Cavallaro peppe.cavall...@st.com
should detect that BUG never returns). The include-removal could be in a
seperate patch, not sure if it is worth, though.
It can include in a separate patch.
It makes sense if apply the previous patch to split the header file
because we remove duplicated include files.
I understand, but
On 09/27/2010 04:13 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 02:57:50PM +0200, Peppe CAVALLARO wrote:
OK for the host-struct. What about the io-accessors? Do we really need
them?
Hi Wolfram.
Hmm, it's not necessary to move them, indeed.
They can stay in the original header if you
Hmm, it's not necessary to move them, indeed.
They can stay in the original header if you prefer.
No issues on my side at all.
Let me know so I'll rework the patch and send it again.
You should know that yourself by now ;)
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang
Hi Matt,
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 09:42:19AM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
There are two checks that need to be made when determining whether a
card is removable. A host controller may set MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE if the
controller does not support removing cards (e.g. eMMC), in which case
the card
Hi Zhangfei,
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 12:23:33AM -0400, zhangfei gao wrote:
From: Zhangfei Gao zhangfei@marvell.com
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 15:15:18 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] sdhci: correct f_min in sd 3.0
Signed-off-by: Zhangfei Gao zhangfei@marvell.com
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c |
Ben Dooks worte:
On 17/09/10 10:45, Kukjin Kim wrote:
From: Hyuk Lee hyuk1@samsung.com
This patch adds to support no internal clock divider in SDHCI.
The external clock divider can be used to make a proper clock
because SDHCI doesn't support internal clock divider by itself.
On 28-9-2010 11:34, zhangfei gao wrote:
Just curious how to get 40, which is slowest speed for
initializaion, is this OK for all card?
Hi Zhangfei,
It looks as if you missed another thread about f_min recently?
See: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/177932/
This was in response to
Jeongbae Seo wrote:
Ben Dooks worte:
On 17/09/10 10:45, Kukjin Kim wrote:
From: Hyuk Lee hyuk1@samsung.com
This patch adds to support no internal clock divider in SDHCI.
The external clock divider can be used to make a proper clock
because SDHCI doesn't support internal
Jae hoon Chung wrote:
2010/9/17 Matt Fleming m...@console-pimps.org:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 03:46:50PM +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
Hi all,
This is a RFC patch that support clock-gating for saving power
consumption.
I found mmc_host_enable/mmc_host_disable function in core.c
(using
To Ben,
Maybe you missing this patch. It's the jaehoon's approach.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
2010/8/31 Jaehoon Chung jh80.ch...@samsung.com:
This is sdhci-s3c patch for c210.
c210 didn't use divider of host controller.
Host Controller need other clock setting methods.
So I add the callback
29 matches
Mail list logo
