this patch fix timeout problems on i.MX's sdhci as suggested by
Richard Zhu.
Tested on :
- i.MX257 : not needed
- i.MX357 : needed
- i.MX515 : needed
more details can be found here :
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2010-October/029748.html
Signed-off-by: Eric Bénard
Tested
only these CPU's errata list this bug.
Signed-off-by: Eric Bénard
Acked-by: Wolfram Sang
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c |8 +---
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
index 28e63ef.
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 11:20:27PM +0200, Eric Bénard wrote:
> this patch fix timeout problems on i.MX's sdhci as suggested by
> Richard Zhu.
>
> Tested on :
> - i.MX257 : not needed
> - i.MX357 : needed
> - i.MX515 : needed
>
> more details can be found here :
> http://lists.infradead.org/piperm
Hi,
I am trying to understand the linux mmc stack implementation for
educational/research purpose and finding it very hard to track the
inter-relation among the source files. Do you have a high-level design
documentation of the stack or any other place where i can find the
design or notes on the i
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 7:04 AM, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:58:14AM +0100, Chris Ball wrote:
> [...]
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
>> +static int sdhci_pxa_suspend(struct platform_device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct sdhci_host *host =
>> platform_get_drvdata(to_platform_device(d
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:58:14AM +0100, Chris Ball wrote:
[...]
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> +static int sdhci_pxa_suspend(struct platform_device *dev)
> +{
> + struct sdhci_host *host = platform_get_drvdata(to_platform_device(dev));
> +
> + return sdhci_suspend_host(host, state);
> +}
> +
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:46:19AM +0200, Eric Bénard wrote:
> only these CPU's errata list this bug.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Bénard
Acked-by: Wolfram Sang
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
commit ffe8018c3424892c9590048fc36caa6c3e0c8a76 of the -mm tree
fixes the initramfs size calculation for e.g. s390 but breaks it
for 32bit architectures which do not define CONFIG_32BIT.
This patch fix the problem for PPC32 which will elsewise end up
with a __initramfs_size of 0.
Signed-off-by: K
As it turned out the PPC32 build was broken - due to changes in the
initramfs size calculation - I ended up with a __initramfs_size of zero,
after
which not much worked.
Sorry for cluttering the list with misleading information, however, no
one seem
to have taken any notice so I guess - no har
Hi Russell,
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 04:44:07PM +0800, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
> I'm fine on this. Please merge it via the MMC tree.
I'm planning on merging this patch via the MMC tree, please let me know
if you object. Thanks.
From: Zhangfei Gao
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 10:51:28 -0400
Subject: [P
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 03:13:02PM +0100, Chris Ball wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 08:32:46AM -0400, zhangfei gao wrote:
>> > Update with comments from Matt and Eric.
>> > Test with sd and emmc.
>> >
>> > >From e5dd554ed4d3488a83d9a
this patch fix timeout problems on i.MX's sdhci as suggested by
Richard Zhu.
Tested on :
- i.MX257 : not needed
- i.MX357 : needed
- i.MX515 : needed
more details can be found here :
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2010-October/029748.html
Signed-off-by: Eric Bénard
Tested
only these CPU's errata list this bug.
Signed-off-by: Eric Bénard
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c |8 +---
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
index 31256ad..14d2836 100644
--- a/dr
Hi Wolfram,
Le 22/10/2010 08:18, Wolfram Sang a écrit :
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 11:20:28PM +0200, Eric Bénard wrote:
only these CPU's errata list this bug.
So, it was not directly tested?
While I was testing the other quirk, I tested this one on 25, 35 & 51, but I
can't trigger the bug on a
14 matches
Mail list logo
