On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 9:17 PM, Philip Rakity wrote:
>
> I am confused. Your patch modifiies
>
> sdhci_suspend_host () to
+ sdhci_clear_set_irqs(host, SDHCI_INT_ALL_MASK, 0);
>>>
>
>
>
> #define SDHCI_INT_ALL_MASK ((unsigned int)-1)
>
> static void sdhci_clear_set_irqs(struct sdhci
I am confused. Your patch modifiies
sdhci_suspend_host () to
>>> + sdhci_clear_set_irqs(host, SDHCI_INT_ALL_MASK, 0);
>>
#define SDHCI_INT_ALL_MASK ((unsigned int)-1)
static void sdhci_clear_set_irqs(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 clear, u32 set)
{
u32 ier;
ier = s
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2011, zhangfei gao wrote:
>
>> >From b7be39e0bbac3950057078ac66900ebc0871f77e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Zhangfei Gao
>> Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 18:02:47 -0500
>> Subject: [PATCH] mmc: clear all interrupt in suspend befo
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 7:20 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> First case: you want to stop the clock _to_ the _card_ when not talking
> to it. That has nothing to do with power saving performed within the
> host controller. This is for reducing power consumption by the _card_
> (and possibly by the c
>
> First case: you want to stop the clock _to_ the _card_ when not talking
> to it. That has nothing to do with power saving performed within the
> host controller. This is for reducing power consumption by the _card_
> (and possibly by the clock generator). The runtime PM stuff has no
> busi
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 02:07:21PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > On Sat, 22 Jan 2011, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 04:14:46PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 21 Jan 2011, Tony Olech wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Add a d
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 02:07:21PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jan 2011, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 04:14:46PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > > On Fri, 21 Jan 2011, Tony Olech wrote:
> > >
> > > > Add a driver for Elan Digital System's VUB300 chip
> > > > whic
