On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Saturday 19 February 2011 00:17:51 Andrei Warkentin wrote:
>> # echo 0 > /sys/block/mmcblk0/device/page_size
>> # ./flashbench -A -b 1024 /dev/block/mmcblk0p9
>> write align 8388608 pre 3.59ms on 6.54ms post 3.65ms diff
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 3:54 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 18 February 2011 23:40:16 Andrei Warkentin wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Andrei Warkentin
>> wrote:
>>
>> Flashbench timings for both Sandisk and Toshiba cards. Attaching due to size.
>
> Very nice, thanks for the mea
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 03:49:04PM -0800, David Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>
> > This patch is for RFC only; it needs splitting up somewhat. However, I
> > wanted to get it out there for some comment.
>
> Just for kicks, I applied this and ran it on an MS
On Saturday 19 February 2011 00:17:51 Andrei Warkentin wrote:
> # echo 0 > /sys/block/mmcblk0/device/page_size
> # ./flashbench -A -b 1024 /dev/block/mmcblk0p9
> write align 8388608 pre 3.59ms on 6.54ms post 3.65ms diff
> 2.92ms
> write align 4194304 pre 4.13ms on 7.37m
On Friday 18 February 2011 23:40:16 Andrei Warkentin wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Andrei Warkentin
> wrote:
>
> Flashbench timings for both Sandisk and Toshiba cards. Attaching due to size.
Very nice, thanks for the measurement!
I don't think having the results inline in the mail i
