On 14 September 2011 01:37, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> 2011/9/14 Per Forlin :
>> Hi Akinobu,
>>
>> On 13 September 2011 16:19, Per Forlin wrote:
>>> On 13 September 2011 15:12, Akinobu Mita wrote:
2011/8/19 Per Forlin :
> +#ifdef KERNEL
> +/*
> + * Internal function. Pass the bo
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Tanmay Upadhyay
wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Tanmay Upadhyay
Acked-by: Zhangfei Gao
Thanks
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pxav2.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc"
Signed-off-by: Tanmay Upadhyay
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pxav2.c |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pxav2.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pxav2.c
index 38f5899..1114fe2 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pxav2.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/s
Chris Ball wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 13 2011, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 08 2011, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
> >> > Erase unit size of high capacity is multiple of 512KiB not 1024KiB.
> >>
> >> Could we have some more info, please? What are the visible symptoms
> >> of the erase unit s
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 13 2011, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 08 2011, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
>> > Erase unit size of high capacity is multiple of 512KiB not 1024KiB.
>>
>> Could we have some more info, please? What are the visible symptoms
>> of the erase unit size being incorrect, how did you rea
Chris Ball wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Sep 08 2011, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
> > Erase unit size of high capacity is multiple of 512KiB not 1024KiB.
>
> Could we have some more info, please? What are the visible symptoms
> of the erase unit size being incorrect, how did you realize this was
> a prob
2011/9/14 Per Forlin :
> Hi Akinobu,
>
> On 13 September 2011 16:19, Per Forlin wrote:
>> On 13 September 2011 15:12, Akinobu Mita wrote:
>>> 2011/8/19 Per Forlin :
>>>
+#ifdef KERNEL
+/*
+ * Internal function. Pass the boot param fail_mmc_request to
+ * the setup fault inject
[ Re-added Cc:s ]
On 09/13/2011 02:48 PM, Philip Rakity wrote:
> cool -- rules out ALL sdhci 3.0 changes.
>
>
> next step
>
> in sdhci.c -- look for -E (case matters)
>
> will show where errors are detected.
>
> add
>
> sdhci_dumpregs(host);
>
> so we can see the registers when the
Signed-off-by: Per Forlin
---
Documentation/fault-injection/fault-injection.txt |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/fault-injection/fault-injection.txt
b/Documentation/fault-injection/fault-injection.txt
index 70f924e..ba4be8b 100644
--- a/Docu
Replace setup("fail_mmc_request") and faulty "ifdef KERNEL" with
a simple module_param(). The module param mmc_core.fail_request
may be used to set the fault injection attributes during boot time
or module load time.
Signed-off-by: Per Forlin
---
drivers/mmc/core/debugfs.c | 29 +++
mmc_core module needs to use setup_fault_attr() in order
to set fault injection attributes during module load time.
Signed-off-by: Per Forlin
---
lib/fault-inject.c |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/fault-inject.c b/lib/fault-inject.c
index 328d433..4
Akinobu Mita reported that the boot option for mmc fault injection is never
compiled in due to a fauly "ifdef KERNEL" that is never set.
A correct ifdef would be "ifndef MODULE". Akinobu suggested to use
a module param instead.
This patch set is for 3.2
Per Forlin (3):
fault-inject: export setu
On 09/13/2011 01:27 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> I have 1.17 installed at the moment. It looks like 1.21 is current, so
> I could try updating it. But the Fedora 15 2.6.38 kernel worked fine
> with this controller and cards, so I don't think BIOS version is an
> issue. Also, there's nothing
What card are you using ?
On Sep 13, 2011, at 1:27 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 09/13/2011 12:29 PM, Manoj Iyer wrote:
>>
>> @Jeremy, Could the problem be BIOS related? we have seen a number of
>> issues with older bioses on the x220s.
>
> I have 1.17 installed at the moment. It looks
On 09/13/2011 12:29 PM, Manoj Iyer wrote:
>
> @Jeremy, Could the problem be BIOS related? we have seen a number of
> issues with older bioses on the x220s.
I have 1.17 installed at the moment. It looks like 1.21 is current, so
I could try updating it. But the Fedora 15 2.6.38 kernel worked fine
On 09/13/2011 11:49 AM, Chris Ball wrote:
> I just asked Matthew Garrett to check his X220, and his has the same e823
> controller as you, is running a 3.1-rc kernel, and everything's working.
>
> So it's not even variation in the controller model, it's something even
> more subtle. Perhaps try so
@Jeremy, Could the problem be BIOS related? we have seen a number of
issues with older bioses on the x220s.
Here are a few cards I tested with the 3.1 RC4 kernel on Ubuntu running on
a Lenovo X220. with Ricoh e823 card reader.
== kernel version ==
Linux u 3.1.0-0301rc4-generic #201108290905 S
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 13 2011, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>> If it is running, and not helping, can I persuade you to try a full
>> bisection?
>
> OK, will do.
Thank you!
>> I don't think we have other reports of this bug, and the
>> only other person who has reported something like it wasn't a kern
On 09/13/2011 10:12 AM, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> On Tue, Sep 13 2011, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 12 2011, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
Since 2.6.39, the SD card slot in my Lenovo X220 has stopped working.
When I insert a card with current linux.git kernel (3.1-rc
Hi Jeremy,
On Tue, Sep 13 2011, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 12 2011, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>> Since 2.6.39, the SD card slot in my Lenovo X220 has stopped working.
>>> When I insert a card with current linux.git kernel (3.1-rc6), I get:
>>>
>>> [ 3891.745549] mmc0: new SDHC c
On 09/13/2011 06:22 AM, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> On Mon, Sep 12 2011, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>> Since 2.6.39, the SD card slot in my Lenovo X220 has stopped working.
>> When I insert a card with current linux.git kernel (3.1-rc6), I get:
>>
>> [ 3891.745549] mmc0: new SDHC card at a
Le 07/09/2011 13:40, Nicolas Ferre :
> While using io multiple blocks operations, change the way that sg is built:
> use one sg entry for each block instead of aggregating the whole buffer
> in a single sg entry.
> Using a single sg entry for a multiple block command may lead to
> misunderstanding
Hi Akinobu,
On 13 September 2011 16:19, Per Forlin wrote:
> On 13 September 2011 15:12, Akinobu Mita wrote:
>> 2011/8/19 Per Forlin :
>>
>>> +#ifdef KERNEL
>>> +/*
>>> + * Internal function. Pass the boot param fail_mmc_request to
>>> + * the setup fault injection attributes routine.
>>> + */
>>
On 13 September 2011 15:12, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> 2011/8/19 Per Forlin :
>
>> +#ifdef KERNEL
>> +/*
>> + * Internal function. Pass the boot param fail_mmc_request to
>> + * the setup fault injection attributes routine.
>> + */
>> +static int __init setup_fail_mmc_request(char *str)
>> +{
>> +
Hi Jeremy,
On Mon, Sep 12 2011, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Since 2.6.39, the SD card slot in my Lenovo X220 has stopped working.
> When I insert a card with current linux.git kernel (3.1-rc6), I get:
>
> [ 3891.745549] mmc0: new SDHC card at address b368
> [ 3891.790704] mmcblk0: mmc0:b368 PNY
2011/8/19 Per Forlin :
> +#ifdef KERNEL
> +/*
> + * Internal function. Pass the boot param fail_mmc_request to
> + * the setup fault injection attributes routine.
> + */
> +static int __init setup_fail_mmc_request(char *str)
> +{
> + return setup_fault_attr(&fail_mmc_request, str);
> +}
> +_
During a rescan operation mmc_attach(sd|mmc|sdio) functions are
called. The error handling in these function can trigger a detach
of the bus, which also meant a power off. This is not notified by
the rescan operation which then continues to the next attach function.
If a power off has been done, t
This patch adds the power off notification handling
during suspend and system poweroff.
For suspend mode short timeout is used, whereas for the
normal poweroff long timeout is used.
Signed-off-by: Girish K S
---
drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 34 ++
drivers/mmc/core
This patch adds the support for power off notify feature
available in eMMC 4.5 devices.
If the the host has support for this feature, then the
mmc core will notify it to the device by setting the
POWER_OFF_NOTIFICATION byte in the extended csd register
with a value 1(POWER_ON).
This
This patch version fixes the problem with power off
notify function, when called for the first time and
card is not yet initialised.
Earlier version will generate a core dump, so a check
for NULL is required in the power off function.
Girish K S (2):
mmc: core: Add power off notify feature(eMM
This patch adds the power class selection feature available
for mmc versions 4.0 and above.
During the enumeration stage before switching to the lower
data bus, check if the power class is supported for the
current bus width. If the power class is available then
switch to the power class and use th
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 1:26 AM, Per Forlin wrote:
> On 1 September 2011 21:05, Venkatraman S wrote:
>> Reuse omap_hsmmc_dma_cleanup even for normal dma teardown in
>> omap_hsmmc_dma_cb. Consolidate multiple points of dma unmap into a
>> single location in post_req function, to prevent double unm
32 matches
Mail list logo
