Girish K S wrote:
Hi Jeon,
I tried to apply your patch to the latest Chris-mmc/mmc-next branch.
but the patch fails. can you please check
err message.
error: patch failed: include/linux/mmc/card.h:52
error: include/linux/mmc/card.h: patch does not apply
error: patch failed:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 3:50 PM, NamJae Jeon linkinj...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/9/28 Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org:
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 7:07 AM, Namjae Jeon linkinj...@gmail.com wrote:
179 64 1024 mmcblk0boot1
179 32 1024 mmcblk0boot0
Does this mean that each
Dear all,
Since the member host-ext_caps is a duplicate of host-caps2 which
is already accepted in mainline by maintainer. I will resend my
patch by using the existing caps2 member of struct mmc_host .
regards
Girish K S
On 28 September 2011 10:30, Girish K S girish.shivananja...@linaro.org
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:34 PM, Praveen G K praveen...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem is I am seeing write
speeds of about 5MBps on a Sandisk eMMC product and I can clearly see
the time lost when measured between sending a command and receiving a
data irq. I am not sure what kind of an issue
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:34 PM, J Freyensee
james_p_freyen...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Now in the 3.0 kernel I know mmc_wait_for_req() has changed and the goal was
to try and make that function a bit more non-blocking,
What has been done by Per Förlin is to add pre_req/post_req hooks
for the
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org wrote:
Have you tried to make a deeper analysis of the card
characteristics using Arnd Bergmanns flashbench tool?
http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/arnd/flashbench.git;a=summary
There you will see for sure if there
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:00:58AM +0800, Bryan Wu wrote:
Hiya,
Any comments and need I do anything to improve this patch?
No idea, I don't remember the original errors which this stuff spat out
and how they were caused.
The only thing I care about is that the conversion of the existing ARM
On 09/29/2011 09:24 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:34 PM, J Freyensee
james_p_freyen...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Now in the 3.0 kernel I know mmc_wait_for_req() has changed and the goal was
to try and make that function a bit more non-blocking,
What has been done by Per
2011/9/29 Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 3:50 PM, NamJae Jeon linkinj...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/9/28 Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org:
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 7:07 AM, Namjae Jeon linkinj...@gmail.com wrote:
179 64 1024 mmcblk0boot1
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 5:49 AM, Shashidhar Hiremath
shashidh...@vayavyalabs.com wrote:
+ .detect_delay_ms = 200,
+ .fifo_depth = 32,
+};
+#endif
+
static struct workqueue_struct *dw_mci_card_workqueue;
#if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS)
@@
From: Barry Song baohua.s...@csr.com
Some devices like mmc are async detected very slow. For example,
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c launchs a 200ms delayed work to detect
mmc partitions then add disk.
we do have wait_for_device_probe and scsi_complete_async_scans
before calling swsusp_check, but it
Hi Will,James,
When I looked at few examples of the pci platform support in kernel,I
could find that they have used separate files for pci and platform.I
feel I may not split the driver into 3 files since its not as complex
as sdhci driver.So can I merge the ifdefs and have separate functions
This patch adds the support of the HS200 bus speed for
eMMC 4.5 devices.
The eMMC 4.5 devices have support for 200MHz bus speed.
The mmc core and host modules have been touched to add support
for this module.
It is necessary to know the card type in the sdhci.c file to
add support for eMMC tuning
This patch adds the support for power off notify feature
available in eMMC 4.5 devices.
If the the host has support for this feature, then the
mmc core will notify it to the device by setting the
POWER_OFF_NOTIFICATION byte in the extended csd register
with a value 1(POWER_ON).
For
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 02:29:08 PDT, Barry Song said:
This patch adds resumewait kernel param just like rootwait so
that we have enough time to wait mmc ready. The differene is
here we wait for resume partition but rootwait waits for rootfs
partition.
OK, seems a reasonable idea...
hi Valdis,
2011/9/29 valdis.kletni...@vt.edu:
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 02:29:08 PDT, Barry Song said:
This patch adds resumewait kernel param just like rootwait so
that we have enough time to wait mmc ready. The differene is
here we wait for resume partition but rootwait waits for rootfs
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Adrian Hunter adrian.hun...@nokia.com wrote:
Go through the driver's set_power() functions rather than
calling regulator_enable/disable() directly because otherwise
pbias configuration for MMC1 is not done.
Hi Chris,
Are you OK to queue this patch as bug fix.
Fix the typo, instead it should be SDMMC1
USBC1 is not related to MMC1 I/Os
Signed-off-by: Balaji T K balaj...@ti.com
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/hsmmc.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/hsmmc.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/hsmmc.c
index
MMC1 pbias and speed control fix for SDMMC1 extended I/O cell
Balaji T K (2):
arm: omap4: hsmmc: Fix Pbias configuration on regulator OFF
arm: omap4: hsmmc: configure SDMMC1_DR0 properly
arch/arm/mach-omap2/hsmmc.c | 16 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
MMC1 data line IO's are powered down in before set regulator function.
IO's should not be powered ON when regulator is OFF.
Keep the IO's in power pown mode after regulator OFF.
Delete incorrect comments which are not applicable for OMAP4.
Signed-off-by: Balaji T K balaj...@ti.com
Signed-off-by:
From: Balaji T K balaj...@ti.com
Will resend this series as my email id is garbled.
MMC1 pbias and speed control fix for SDMMC1 extended I/O cell
Balaji T K (2):
arm: omap4: hsmmc: Fix Pbias configuration on regulator OFF
arm: omap4: hsmmc: configure SDMMC1_DR0 properly
From: Barry Song baohua.s...@csr.com
Some devices like mmc are async detected very slow. For example,
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c launchs a 200ms delayed work to detect
mmc partitions then add disk.
we do have wait_for_device_probe and scsi_complete_async_scans
before calling swsusp_check, but it
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Barry Song barry.s...@csr.com wrote:
From: Barry Song baohua.s...@csr.com
Some devices like mmc are async detected very slow. For example,
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c launchs a 200ms delayed work to detect
mmc partitions then add disk.
we do have
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Barry Song barry.s...@csr.com wrote:
From: Barry Song baohua.s...@csr.com
Some devices like mmc are async detected very slow. For example,
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c launchs a 200ms
* Balaji T K balaj...@ti.com [110929 07:11]:
MMC1 data line IO's are powered down in before set regulator function.
IO's should not be powered ON when regulator is OFF.
Keep the IO's in power pown mode after regulator OFF.
Delete incorrect comments which are not applicable for OMAP4.
Care to
Namjae,
- Original Message -
From: Namjae Jeon linkinj...@gmail.com
To: c...@laptop.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org, awarken...@vmware.com, adrian hunter
adrian.hun...@intel.com, linus walleij
linus.wall...@linaro.org, james p freyensee
Support of PCI mode for the dw_mmc driver This Patch adds the support for the
scenario where the Synopsys Designware IP is present on the PCI bus.The patch
adds the minimal modifications necessary for the driver to work on PCI
platform. The Driver has also been tested for on the PCI platform
On 09/29/2011 01:17 AM, Per Förlin wrote:
On 09/29/2011 09:24 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:34 PM, J Freyensee
james_p_freyen...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Now in the 3.0 kernel I know mmc_wait_for_req() has changed and the goal was
to try and make that function a bit more
2011/9/29 Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Barry Song barry.s...@csr.com wrote:
From: Barry Song baohua.s...@csr.com
Some devices like mmc are async detected very slow. For example,
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c launchs a 200ms delayed work to detect
mmc
2011/9/29 Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Barry Song barry.s...@csr.com wrote:
From: Barry Song baohua.s...@csr.com
Some devices like mmc are async detected very slow. For
Hi Shashidhar.
On 09/30/2011 02:40 AM, Shashidhar Hiremath wrote:
Support of PCI mode for the dw_mmc driver This Patch adds the support for the
scenario where the Synopsys Designware IP is present on the PCI bus.The patch
adds the minimal modifications necessary for the driver to work on
Perhaps rebase against Chris' mmc-next branch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-mmc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
32 matches
Mail list logo
