On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 10:33:06AM +0500, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote:
Add new error value so that drivers can request deferred probe
from drivercore.
Signed-off-by: G, Manjunath Kondaiah manj...@ti.com
Reported-by: Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
---
Cc:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 10:33:07AM +0500, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote:
From: Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
Allow drivers to report at probe time that they cannot get all the
resources required by the device, and should be retried at a
later time.
This should completely solve
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 10:33:05AM +0500, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote:
Why did you send this series of patches out twice? Were they different?
confused,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-mmc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More
Hi Greg,
On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 11:50:42PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 10:33:05AM +0500, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote:
Why did you send this series of patches out twice? Were they different?
confused,
Looks like this patch series has reached only individual recepients
On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 11:43:49PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 10:33:06AM +0500, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote:
+#define EPROBE_DEFER 517 /* restart probe again after some time
*/
Can we really do this? Isn't this some user/kernel api here?
What's wrong with
On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 10:33:09 +0500
G, Manjunath Kondaiah manj...@ti.com wrote:
The gpio library should return -EPROBE_DEFER in gpio_request
if gpio driver is not ready.
Why not use the perfectly good existing error codes we have for this ?
We have EAGAIN and EUNATCH both of which look
Stefan NILSSON9 wrote:
Hi Russel,
On 10/01/2011 06:09 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
Does this even work? From the MMCI spec, I see no way for the MMCI
peripheral to know the size of the read/write on the APB bus.
The APB bus signals the MMCI uses are:
PCLK - APB bus clock
PRESETn -
Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 09:46:08AM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
From: Stefan Nilsson XK stefan.xk.nils...@stericsson.com
Corrects a bug in pio read when reading packets 4 bytes. These
small packets are only relevant for SDIO transfers.
Does this even work? From
2011/10/7 Pavel Machek pa...@ucw.cz:
2011/9/29 Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Barry Song barry.s...@csr.com wrote:
From: Barry Song baohua.s...@csr.com
Some devices like mmc are async detected very slow. For example,
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
2011/10/7 Barry Song 21cn...@gmail.com:
2011/10/7 Pavel Machek pa...@ucw.cz:
2011/9/29 Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Barry Song barry.s...@csr.com wrote:
From: Barry Song baohua.s...@csr.com
Some devices like mmc are async detected very slow. For
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 03:38:44PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
In this hot path we already do a read of the FIFOCNT register for every
loop in pio_read, won't this sometimes cause caches to flush and
similar, thus cost quite a lot - at least a lot more than executing a
switch/if sentence
On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 11:49:28PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 10:33:07AM +0500, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote:
+config PROBE_DEFER
+ bool Deferred Driver Probe
+ default y
+ help
+ This option provides deferring driver probe if it has dependency on
+
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 01:57:15PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 11:49:28PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 10:33:07AM +0500, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote:
+config PROBE_DEFER
+ bool Deferred Driver Probe
+ default y
+ help
+ This option
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:49 AM, Greg KH g...@kroah.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 10:33:07AM +0500, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote:
+config PROBE_DEFER
+ bool Deferred Driver Probe
+ default y
+ help
+ This option provides deferring driver probe if it has dependency on
+
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Alan Cox a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk wrote:
On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 10:33:09 +0500
G, Manjunath Kondaiah manj...@ti.com wrote:
The gpio library should return -EPROBE_DEFER in gpio_request
if gpio driver is not ready.
Why not use the perfectly good existing error
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:43 AM, Greg KH g...@kroah.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 10:33:06AM +0500, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote:
Add new error value so that drivers can request deferred probe
from drivercore.
Signed-off-by: G, Manjunath Kondaiah manj...@ti.com
Reported-by: Grant Likely
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:05 PM, G, Manjunath Kondaiah manj...@ti.com wrote:
Existing omap hsmmc driver uses platform_driver_probe in init
function. Change it to use platform_driver_register in order to
use deferral probe mechanism.
Signed-off-by: G, Manjunath Kondaiah manj...@ti.com
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote:
Hello,
Some MMC controller instances integrated on older OMAP34xx/35xx chips
don't work correctly with multiple-block reads, due to a hardware bug.
This series fixes the problem by adding an MMC capability flag for this
case
On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 16:12:45 MDT, Grant Likely said:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:43 AM, Greg KH g...@kroah.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 10:33:06AM +0500, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote:
+#define EPROBE_DEFER 517 /* restart probe again after some time */
Can we really do this?
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 07:28:33PM -0400, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 16:12:45 MDT, Grant Likely said:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:43 AM, Greg KH g...@kroah.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 10:33:06AM +0500, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote:
+#define EPROBE_DEFER 517
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 02:23:26PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 01:57:15PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 11:49:28PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 10:33:07AM +0500, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote:
+config PROBE_DEFER
+ bool
21 matches
Mail list logo
