With the inclusion of following patch:
"mmc: sdhci: remove "state" argument from sdhci_suspend_host"
we get a compilation error for sdhci-spear:
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-spear.c:283:2: error: too many arguments to function
‘sdhci_suspend_host’
This patch fixes this error.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kum
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 03 2012, Alexander Elbs wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 08:24:55PM -0500, Chris Ball wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 02 2012, Philip Rakity wrote:
>> > Ack-by: Philip Rakity
>>
>> Thanks. Alexander, could you give me a "Signed-off-by:" for the record?
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexan
Thanks, Chris.
I will try it.
If it is ok, I will post the new patch.
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Ball [mailto:c...@laptop.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 10:12 AM
> To: Wolfram Sang
> Cc: Huang Changming-R66093; linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org; Huang Changming-
> R66093; Jiang Yut
V3: Rework on top of Adrian's vmmc patch
V2: Error processing code in sdhci_pci_suspend should not be deleted,
it is used to resume hosts which are already successfully suspended for
a multi slot pci device as suggested by Adrian.
If there are errors happened in sdhci_suspend_host, handle it so t
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 03 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
> I'm sorry Chris, this patch is deprecated and please apply the following
> patch with Adrian's ack instead:
> [PATCH 1/2] mmc: sdhci: Fix tuning timer incorrect setting when suspending
> host
Okay -- I've pushed that one instead, thanks.
- Chris.
--
C
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 07:02:27PM -0500, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Dec 26 2011, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > From: Philip Rakity
> >
> > Since we are suspending, the tuning timer should be deactivated.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Philip Rakity
> > Acked-by: Aaron Lu
> > ---
> > drivers/mmc/host/s
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Shmidt
---
drivers/mmc/card/block.c |2 +-
drivers/mmc/core/bus.c | 25 +++--
include/linux/mmc/card.h |2 +-
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
index 1e0e27c..96
* Oliver Hartkopp (socket...@hartkopp.net) wrote:
> On 03.01.2012 19:39, Chris Wright wrote:
>
> > * Oliver Hartkopp (socket...@hartkopp.net) wrote:
> >> i have a Dell 6510 with i7 CPU (M 640 @ 2.80GHz) with integrated GPU.
> >>
> >> With 3.2-rc - even with the very latest Linux version from Linu
Hi Chris,
I have received some great comments some Vitaly Wool around the patch 2
"mmc: Minimize resume-time by deferring resume".
It would be interesting to hear if you or someone else has any thinking
around these patches. Vitaly were mainly thinking of a pm_qos approach,
which still is a bi
Removing a card "slowly" can trigger a GPIO irq to be raised far
before the card is actually removed. This means the scheduled
detect work will not find out that the card were removed and thus
the card and the block device will not be unregistered.
Let the mmc_detect_card_removed function trigger
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 7:00 AM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
> UHS_REG should be cleared for non-DDR mode. But currently there is
> no way to clear DDR mode, if it is already set once. This patch adds
> clearing DDR mode for non-DDD mode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Seungwon Jeon
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 08:24:55PM -0500, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jan 02 2012, Philip Rakity wrote:
> > Ack-by: Philip Rakity
>
> Thanks. Alexander, could you give me a "Signed-off-by:" for the record?
>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Elbs
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c |3 +--
1 f
12 matches
Mail list logo