Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] mmc: core: Support packed command for eMMC4.5 device

2012-02-29 Thread Namjae Jeon
Hi. merez. Would you share random read speed with us ? And Write speed also.. Thanks. 2012/3/1 : >> This patch supports packed command of eMMC4.5 device. >> Several reads(or writes) can be grouped in packed command >> and all data of the individual commands can be sent in a >> single transfer

Re: [PATCH] mmc: core: remove waiting time when clkgate_delay is set

2012-02-29 Thread Sujit Reddy Thumma
On 2/29/2012 11:22 AM, Chanho Park wrote: Since recent commit("mmc: core: Use delayed work in clock gating framework":597dd9d79cfbbb1), we always wait "unnecessary" default clock delay(8 cycles). Actually, we don't need it if clkgate_delay (unit:ms) is set because we already wait sufficient time

Re: atmel-mci causing oops?

2012-02-29 Thread Ludovic Desroches
Hi Chris, On 02/29/2012 06:35 PM, Chris Ball wrote: > Hi Ludovic, > > On Wed, Feb 29 2012, Ludovic Desroches wrote: >> You can find the two patches into the mmc-next tree of Chris: >> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/cjb/mmc.git;a=commit;h=43df92914ea0623893bcb801791d5d2be2f5e015 >> http:

Re: [PATCH] mmc: mmci: reduce max_blk_count to avoid overflowing max_req_size

2012-02-29 Thread Will Deacon
[adding Pierre with the correct email address] On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 11:25:21AM +, Will Deacon wrote: > On a system with large pages (64k in my case), the following BUG is > triggered in MMC core: > > [2.338023] BUG: failure at > drivers/mmc/core/core.c:221/mmc_start_request()! > [

Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] mmc: core: Support packed command for eMMC4.5 device

2012-02-29 Thread merez
> This patch supports packed command of eMMC4.5 device. > Several reads(or writes) can be grouped in packed command > and all data of the individual commands can be sent in a > single transfer on the bus. > > Signed-off-by: Seungwon Jeon > --- > drivers/mmc/card/block.c | 496 > +++

Re: atmel-mci causing oops?

2012-02-29 Thread Chris Ball
Hi Ludovic, On Wed, Feb 29 2012, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > You can find the two patches into the mmc-next tree of Chris: > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/cjb/mmc.git;a=commit;h=43df92914ea0623893bcb801791d5d2be2f5e015 > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/cjb/mmc.git;a=commit;h=9

Re: atmel-mci causing oops?

2012-02-29 Thread Ludovic Desroches
Hello Daniel, Sorry to break the thread, I have just suscribed to the linux-mmc mailing list. > > Hi all, > > Looking for some ideas here.. > > I don't seem to be able to get a better output of the oops (I have debugging > info etc turned on in the config :/). Anyhow, I have 3.1 running with

SD/MMC driver erase

2012-02-29 Thread Karthik
why the erase operation is not implemented in SD/MMC driver in linux? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] patch set about the MXS-DMA

2012-02-29 Thread Huang Shijie
Hi Artem: On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 7:00 AM, Bityutskiy, Artem wrote: > On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 16:25 +0800, Huang Shijie wrote: >> Hi Artem: >> > On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 11:10 +0800, Huang Shijie wrote: >> >> Hi: >> >> >> >> ping. >> > Is this patch-set independent or requires something like gpma patc

RE: [PATCH V2 1/1] mmc: start removing enable / disable API

2012-02-29 Thread Manjunathappa, Prakash
Hi, On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:47:21, Adrian Hunter wrote: > Most parts of the enable / disable API are no longer used and > can be removed. > > Cc: Rajendra Nayak > Cc: Venkatraman S > Cc: Kukjin Kim > Cc: Thomas Abraham > Cc: Kyungmin Park > Cc: Sekhar Nori > Cc: Kevin Hilman > Signed-of

Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] patch set about the MXS-DMA

2012-02-29 Thread Bityutskiy, Artem
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 16:25 +0800, Huang Shijie wrote: > Hi Artem: > > On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 11:10 +0800, Huang Shijie wrote: > >> Hi: > >> > >> ping. > > Is this patch-set independent or requires something like gpma patches? > > > This patch set is independent, and it does not depend upon any othe

Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] patch set about the MXS-DMA

2012-02-29 Thread Huang Shijie
Hi Artem: On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 11:10 +0800, Huang Shijie wrote: Hi: ping. Is this patch-set independent or requires something like gpma patches? This patch set is independent, and it does not depend upon any other patches. I will sent out the new GPMI patches (with DT enable) after this