On 5/14/2012 8:21 PM, Saugata Das wrote:
On 14 May 2012 15:55, Subhash Jadavanisubha...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On 5/9/2012 8:18 PM, Saugata Das wrote:
From: Saugata Dassaugata@linaro.org
This patch adds the support for large sector size of 4KB by disabling
emulation.
This patch passes
Hi Yong Ding,
On 05/15/2012 05:14 AM, Yong Ding wrote:
Hi Ulf Hansson, Thanks for your comments.
Such retry mechanism is a simple CMD-level or sdio-core-level retry
which takes advantage of the mmc core internal retry. There is not
any side effect, but with it, even those SDIO function
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 09:49:24AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 17:04 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
For the full text, please see
http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20120418.100954.7fa7acf8.en.html
This version contains updates for some of the
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 08:41 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 09:49:24AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 17:04 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
For the full text, please see
Hallo Subhash,
One general comment: native sector size is mandatory (as of Jedec spec)
for 256GB devices. For other devices native sector size is optional.
This feature is not meant for performance improvement. Anyway if you
start using your device with 4K alignment, you should already see
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Subhash Jadavani
subha...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On 5/14/2012 8:21 PM, Saugata Das wrote:
On 14 May 2012 15:55, Subhash Jadavanisubha...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On 5/9/2012 8:18 PM, Saugata Das wrote:
From: Saugata Dassaugata@linaro.org
This patch adds
On 15 May 2012 12:10, Subhash Jadavani subha...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On 5/14/2012 8:21 PM, Saugata Das wrote:
On 14 May 2012 15:55, Subhash Jadavanisubha...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On 5/9/2012 8:18 PM, Saugata Das wrote:
From: Saugata Dassaugata@linaro.org
This patch adds the support
On 15 May 2012 15:47, S, Venkatraman svenk...@ti.com wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Subhash Jadavani
subha...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On 5/14/2012 8:21 PM, Saugata Das wrote:
On 14 May 2012 15:55, Subhash Jadavanisubha...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On 5/9/2012 8:18 PM, Saugata Das
Dear Ludovic,
in the meantime I have some new informations about the atmel-mci
deadlock problem: When you write permanently with
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/device bs=512
and removing the card you will get almost always a hang up. With
printk I have find out that the function atmci_tasklet_func
On Wed, April 18, 2012 9:25 am, Venkatraman S wrote:
Hello,
a) At the top level, some policy decisions have to be made on what is
worth preempting for.
This implementation uses the demand paging requests and swap
read requests as potential reads worth preempting an ongoing long write.
In sdhci_set_ios() we call sdhci_set_power()
this code assumes that the SDHCI_POWER_CONTROL register works in the SD
controller.
In our controller it does not. We need a regulator to do the right thing.
I hae added regulator support (patch coming)
BUT the code crashes because we are
11 matches
Mail list logo
