Re: Fwd: [PATCH v3 0/5] mmc: Add access to RPMB partition

2012-11-15 Thread Linus Walleij
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Krishna Konda kko...@codeaurora.org wrote: On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 12:58 -0800, Krishna Konda wrote: The goal of this patchserie is to offer access to MMC RPMB (Replay Protected Memory Block) partition. The RPMB partition is used in general to store some secure

[PATCH] mmc: sdhci: check the quirk HISPD_BIT for SD3.0 card

2012-11-15 Thread Jaehoon Chung
If SD-card is more than SD3.0 card, set to ctrl with UHS-I modes. But in case of Samsung-SoC, didn't use the SDHCI_CTRL_HISPD. So need to check the quirk for SDHCI_QUIRK_NO_HISPD_BIT. Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung jh80.ch...@samsung.com Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.p...@samsung.com ---

RE: [PATCH v8 2/2] mmc: support packed write command for eMMC4.5 device

2012-11-15 Thread Seungwon Jeon
Hi Maya, Thanks to remind it. I'm struggling with something. I didn't check more since v8. Hi Chris, As we know, nand flash write is slower than read, because write is costly operation. Write operation need block erase operation. Of course, if there is free block to write, erase will not

RE: [PATCH v3] mmc: fix async request mechanism for sequential read scenarios

2012-11-15 Thread Seungwon Jeon
I checked this commit. v3 doesn't work in dw_mmc host driver. It makes some driver warning while v1 is fine. I'm finding the reason. And could you check minor one below? On Tuesday, November 13, 2012, Seungwon Jeon tgih@samsung.com Hi Konstantin, I'm looking into this patch. Idea looks

Re: [PATCH] mmc: Standardise capability type

2012-11-15 Thread Linus Walleij
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote: There are discrepancies with regards to how MMC capabilities are carried throughout the subsystem. Let's standardise them to elevate any confusion. Cc: Chris Ball c...@laptop.org Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org

Re: [PATCH] mmc: Standardise capability type

2012-11-15 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thursday 15 November 2012, Linus Walleij wrote: On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote: There are discrepancies with regards to how MMC capabilities are carried throughout the subsystem. Let's standardise them to elevate any confusion. Cc: Chris

Re: [PATCH v1] mmc: fix async request mechanism for sequential read scenarios

2012-11-15 Thread Per Förlin
On 11/14/2012 04:15 PM, Konstantin Dorfman wrote: Hello Per, On 11/13/2012 11:10 PM, Per Forlin wrote: On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Konstantin Dorfman kdorf...@codeaurora.org wrote: Hello, On 10/29/2012 11:40 PM, Per Forlin wrote: Hi, I would like to move the focus of my concerns

[PATCH] mmc: Limit MMC speed to 52MHz if not HS200

2012-11-15 Thread Al Cooper
If caps2 host capabilities does not indicate support for MMC HS200, don't allow clock speeds 52MHz. Currently, for MMC, the clock speed is set to the lesser of the max speed the eMMC module supports (card-ext_csd.hs_max_dtr) or the max base clock of the host controller (host-f_max based on

[PATCH] mmc,sdio: Fix the panic due to devname NULL when calling pm_runtime_set_active()

2012-11-15 Thread Chuansheng Liu
Subject: [PATCH] mmc,sdio: Fix the panic due to devname NULL when calling pm_runtime_set_active() Meet one panic as the below: 1[ 15.067350] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null) 1[ 15.074455] IP: [c1496a42] strlen+0x12/0x20 4[ 15.078803] *pde = 0[