Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] mmc: Add access to RPMB partition

2012-11-20 Thread Loic PALLARDY
On 11/19/2012 07:12 PM, Krishna Konda wrote: On Sat, 2012-11-17 at 18:12 -0500, Chris Ball wrote: I've merged this to mmc-next for 3.8 now; thanks to everyone who Acked. If you have any userspace sample code that could be added to mmc-utils to show how the interface can be used, feel free

Sony memory stick pro duo is not recognized

2012-11-20 Thread Ádám
Hi, I'd like to report a problem. I was following information provided here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Upstream/kernel Thanks. [1.] One line summary of the problem:  Sony memory stick pro duo is not recognized  [2.] Full description of the problem/report: I'm using Ubuntu 12.10 x64 on a Acer

Re: [PATCH v2] mmc: sdhci: apply voltage range check only for non-fixed regulators

2012-11-20 Thread Marek Szyprowski
On 11/13/2012 10:23 PM, Philip Rakity wrote: Hi Marek, Is the regulator dedicated ? or is it shared ? Is it used for eMMC ? If it cannot be turned off -- then just don't list it in the regulators list for vmmc. If it CAN be turned off then need to get back to you. It is dedicated to

Re: UHS-I voltage switching on OLPC XO-1.75

2012-11-20 Thread Johan Rudholm
Hi! 2012/11/18 Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org: On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Johan Rudholm jrudh...@gmail.com wrote: Good question. I’d guess that mmc_power_off/up does not work as expected here, that the card is not at all power cycled. Before going further on the find a way to quirk it

Re: FW: [PATCH v2] mmc: sdhci: apply voltage range check only for non-fixed regulators

2012-11-20 Thread Kevin Liu
2012/11/20 Marek Szyprowski m.szyprow...@samsung.com: Hello, On 11/14/2012 8:11 AM, Kevin Liu wrote: From: linux-mmc-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-mmc-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Chris Ball Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 10:14 PM To: Marek Szyprowski Cc:

[GIT PULL v2] at91: fixes for 3.7-rc7

2012-11-20 Thread Nicolas Ferre
Arnd, Olof, Just for the record, I do not want to put pressure at a such late time in the 3.7-rc process. So, I just reworked that pull-request because the previous one was wrong: - wrong patch content (DT nodes with wrong size) - not all tags in patches (Jean-Christophe and Arnd tags were

Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] mmc: dw-mmc: remove complier warning

2012-11-20 Thread James Hogan
On 20/11/12 01:40, Jaehoon Chung wrote: Hi James, This patch has already merged with Arnd's patch. He also sent the same patch. Ah yes :-) Thanks James Best Regards, Jaehoon Chung On 11/19/2012 09:53 PM, James Hogan wrote: On 19/11/12 12:23, James Hogan wrote: On 08/11/12 08:35,

[PATCH 1/2] mmc: Remove redundant null check before kfree in sdio_bus.c

2012-11-20 Thread Sachin Kamat
kfree on a null pointer is a no-op. Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat sachin.ka...@linaro.org --- drivers/mmc/core/sdio_bus.c |3 +-- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_bus.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_bus.c index 6bf6879..fdcf9e3 100644 ---

[PATCH 2/2] mmc: Remove redundant null check before kfree in bus.c

2012-11-20 Thread Sachin Kamat
kfree on a null pointer is a no-op. Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat sachin.ka...@linaro.org --- drivers/mmc/core/bus.c |3 +-- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c b/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c index 9b68933..420cb67 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c

Re: [PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: enable controller interrupt before calling mmc_start_host

2012-11-20 Thread James Hogan
Hi Yuvaraj, On 20/11/12 05:35, Yuvaraj Kumar wrote: Its not sufficient.In my case, sdio_reset command was submitted to dw_mmc controller before interrupts are enabled. By looking at your log,it seems something wrong with frequency set by your U-boot. I'm not using U-boot, I'm booting with

Re: FW: [PATCH v2] mmc: sdhci: apply voltage range check only for non-fixed regulators

2012-11-20 Thread Marek Szyprowski
Hello, On 11/20/2012 9:59 AM, Kevin Liu wrote: 2012/11/20 Marek Szyprowski m.szyprow...@samsung.com: Hello, On 11/14/2012 8:11 AM, Kevin Liu wrote: From: linux-mmc-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-mmc-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Chris Ball Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Re: FW: [PATCH v2] mmc: sdhci: apply voltage range check only for non-fixed regulators

2012-11-20 Thread Kevin Liu
2012/11/20 Marek Szyprowski m.szyprow...@samsung.com: Hello, On 11/20/2012 9:59 AM, Kevin Liu wrote: 2012/11/20 Marek Szyprowski m.szyprow...@samsung.com: Hello, On 11/14/2012 8:11 AM, Kevin Liu wrote: From: linux-mmc-ow...@vger.kernel.org

Re: FW: [PATCH v2] mmc: sdhci: apply voltage range check only for non-fixed regulators

2012-11-20 Thread Marek Szyprowski
Hello, On 11/20/2012 12:36 PM, Kevin Liu wrote: 2012/11/20 Marek Szyprowski m.szyprow...@samsung.com: On 11/20/2012 9:59 AM, Kevin Liu wrote: 2012/11/20 Marek Szyprowski m.szyprow...@samsung.com: On 11/14/2012 8:11 AM, Kevin Liu wrote: From: linux-mmc-ow...@vger.kernel.org

Re: [PATCH v3] regulator: treat regulators with constant volatage as fixed

2012-11-20 Thread Marek Szyprowski
Hello, On 11/14/2012 3:01 AM, Mark Brown wrote: On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:49:37AM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote: + if (rdev-constraints-valid_ops_mask REGULATOR_CHANGE_VOLTAGE) { + if (rdev-desc-n_voltages) + return rdev-desc-n_voltages; + else +

Re: FW: [PATCH v2] mmc: sdhci: apply voltage range check only for non-fixed regulators

2012-11-20 Thread Chris Ball
Hi, On Tue, Nov 20 2012, Marek Szyprowski wrote: Subject: [PATCH v5 03/13] mmc: sdhci: use regulator min/max voltage range according to spec From: Kevin Liu kl...@marvell.com For regulator vmmc/vmmcq, use voltage range as below 3.3v/3.0v: (2.7v, 3.6v) 1.8v: (1.7v, 1.95v)

Re: FW: [PATCH v2] mmc: sdhci: apply voltage range check only for non-fixed regulators

2012-11-20 Thread Kevin Liu
2012/11/20 Marek Szyprowski m.szyprow...@samsung.com: Hello, On 11/20/2012 12:36 PM, Kevin Liu wrote: 2012/11/20 Marek Szyprowski m.szyprow...@samsung.com: On 11/20/2012 9:59 AM, Kevin Liu wrote: 2012/11/20 Marek Szyprowski m.szyprow...@samsung.com: On 11/14/2012 8:11 AM, Kevin Liu

Re: FW: [PATCH v2] mmc: sdhci: apply voltage range check only for non-fixed regulators

2012-11-20 Thread Marek Szyprowski
Hello, On 11/20/2012 3:14 PM, Kevin Liu wrote: 2012/11/20 Marek Szyprowski m.szyprow...@samsung.com: Hello, On 11/20/2012 12:36 PM, Kevin Liu wrote: 2012/11/20 Marek Szyprowski m.szyprow...@samsung.com: On 11/20/2012 9:59 AM, Kevin Liu wrote: 2012/11/20 Marek Szyprowski

Re: FW: [PATCH v2] mmc: sdhci: apply voltage range check only for non-fixed regulators

2012-11-20 Thread Kevin Liu
2012/11/20 Marek Szyprowski m.szyprow...@samsung.com: Hello, On 11/20/2012 3:14 PM, Kevin Liu wrote: 2012/11/20 Marek Szyprowski m.szyprow...@samsung.com: Hello, On 11/20/2012 12:36 PM, Kevin Liu wrote: 2012/11/20 Marek Szyprowski m.szyprow...@samsung.com: On 11/20/2012 9:59

Re: [PATCH v1] mmc: fix async request mechanism for sequential read scenarios

2012-11-20 Thread Konstantin Dorfman
Hello, On 11/19/2012 11:34 PM, Per Förlin wrote: if (host-areq) { + if (!areq) + mmc_prefetch_init(host-areq, + host-areq-mrq-completion); mmc_wait_for_req_done(host, host-areq-mrq); + if

Re: [RFC PATCH 3.7.0-rc4 0/4] introduce of_simple_module_id_table macro

2012-11-20 Thread Grant Likely
On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 13:21:08 +, Srinivas KANDAGATLA srinivas.kandaga...@st.com wrote: From: Srinivas Kandagatla srinivas.kandaga...@st.com This patch series introduces of_simple_module_id_table macro and as an example uses this macro in 3 files. Most of the device tree supported

Re: [GIT PULL] at91: fixes for 3.7-rc7

2012-11-20 Thread Linus Walleij
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Nicolas Ferre nicolas.fe...@atmel.com wrote: If you do not take it for 3.7, maybe we will have to queue these patches on top of our AT91 pinctrl work (on Linus Walleij side), so, you do need to queue this one for the moment... Tell me what the outcome is, if I

Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] mmc: Add access to RPMB partition

2012-11-20 Thread Krishna Konda
On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 09:25 +0100, Loic PALLARDY wrote: I have a test program I'll integrate in mmc-utils. Regards, Loic Loic/Linus/Chris, I think the IOCTL is not complete in terms of handling the RPMB requests. Here is why I think that is - let me know your opinion There are four

Re: [PATCH v1] mmc: fix async request mechanism for sequential read scenarios

2012-11-20 Thread Konstantin Dorfman
Correction inside On Tue, November 20, 2012 6:26 pm, Konstantin Dorfman wrote: Hello, On 11/19/2012 11:34 PM, Per Förlin wrote: if (host-areq) { + if (!areq) + mmc_prefetch_init(host-areq, + host-areq-mrq-completion);

Re: [GIT PULL] at91: fixes for 3.7-rc7

2012-11-20 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 19:47 Tue 20 Nov , Linus Walleij wrote: On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Nicolas Ferre nicolas.fe...@atmel.com wrote: If you do not take it for 3.7, maybe we will have to queue these patches on top of our AT91 pinctrl work (on Linus Walleij side), so, you do need to queue this

Re: [PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: enable controller interrupt before calling mmc_start_host

2012-11-20 Thread Jaehoon Chung
Hi All, Well, i didn't find the James's error message. But i confused about the clock value. Bus speed : 9984Hz request : 20Hz Div : 250 If bus_speed is divided with div, then actual value should be 399360Hz. But this log is produced 199680Hz. What's wrong? I think this message can

Re: [GIT PULL v2] at91: fixes for 3.7-rc7

2012-11-20 Thread Olof Johansson
Hi, On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 09:59:27AM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote: Arnd, Olof, Just for the record, I do not want to put pressure at a such late time in the 3.7-rc process. So, I just reworked that pull-request because the previous one was wrong: - wrong patch content (DT nodes with wrong