On Friday, November 23, 2012 01:35:58 PM Adrian Hunter wrote:
> Hi
>
> Here is SDHCI ACPI driver.
>
> Changes for v2:
>
> Dropped "PNPACPI: exclude SDHCI devices"
> Added "PNPACPI: exclude devices already bound"
> Changed dev->acpi_handle to ACPI_HANDLE(dev)
> Added Chris
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 01:36:01PM +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter
> Acked-by: Chris Ball
Looks like you left that redundant check in place but it doesn't hurt
anyway.
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 01:36:00PM +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg
> ---
> drivers/acpi/scan.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> index 8c4ac6d..67a7fa6 100644
> --- a/d
Hi,
I looked at the clock thing, and it appears that there's an extra divide
by two in hardware (the TRM says "Clock division is 2*n"), so those
numbers do appear to be correct.
>From some experimentation the other day, it appeared to be a race
condition which is affected by the position of the d
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 08:14:27PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 08:57:26AM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > Does this work with the sdhci stuff?
>
> Honestly, I'm not sure, but I guess it does, since I have seen
> sdhci-pxav3 driver using the helpers. Anyway, I'm go
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 08:57:26AM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> Does this work with the sdhci stuff?
Honestly, I'm not sure, but I guess it does, since I have seen
sdhci-pxav3 driver using the helpers. Anyway, I'm going to adopt
the helpers for sdhci-esdhc-imx driver to find it out.
From: Mika Westerberg
This will exclude ACPI platform devices from also being created
as PNP devices.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter
---
drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/core.c | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/core.c b/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/core.c
index 26b5d4b..653d5
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter
Acked-by: Chris Ball
---
drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig | 12 ++
drivers/mmc/host/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c | 304 ++
3 files changed, 317 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter
---
drivers/acpi/scan.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
index 8c4ac6d..67a7fa6 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -35,6 +35,8 @@ static const char *dummy_hid = "device";
*/
s
Hi
Here is SDHCI ACPI driver.
Changes for v2:
Dropped "PNPACPI: exclude SDHCI devices"
Added "PNPACPI: exclude devices already bound"
Changed dev->acpi_handle to ACPI_HANDLE(dev)
Added Chris' Ack for sdhci-acpi
Adrian Hunter (2):
ACPI: add SDHCI to ACPI pl
On Friday, November 23, 2012 12:23:11 PM Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 22/11/12 23:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, November 22, 2012 04:46:10 PM Adrian Hunter wrote:
> >> On 22/11/12 15:55, Chris Ball wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Nov 22 2012, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> Here is SD
On Friday, November 23, 2012 12:13:13 PM Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 23/11/12 11:34, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:24:33PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Thursday, November 22, 2012 04:46:10 PM Adrian Hunter wrote:
> >>> On 22/11/12 15:55, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi,
On 22/11/12 23:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, November 22, 2012 04:46:10 PM Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> On 22/11/12 15:55, Chris Ball wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 22 2012, Adrian Hunter wrote:
Here is SDHCI ACPI driver. It is dependent on new ACPI Platform support
so I sug
From: Jerry Huang
The IP verions older than 2.3 didn't support the command with busy response
which expect for TC bit set. But after the VVN2.3, eSDHC IP has supported it.
Signed-off-by: Jerry Huang
CC: Anton Vorontsov
CC: Chris Ball
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c |3 +++
1 file c
On 23/11/12 11:34, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:24:33PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Thursday, November 22, 2012 04:46:10 PM Adrian Hunter wrote:
>>> On 22/11/12 15:55, Chris Ball wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 22 2012, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> Here is SDHCI
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:43:50AM +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> +static int __devinit sdhci_acpi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + acpi_handle handle = dev->acpi_handle;
This is not going to work anymore, you'll have to use ACPI_HANDLE(dev)
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:24:33PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, November 22, 2012 04:46:10 PM Adrian Hunter wrote:
> > On 22/11/12 15:55, Chris Ball wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 22 2012, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> > >> Here is SDHCI ACPI driver. It is dependent on new AC
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 04:31:20PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:55:51PM +, Russell King wrote:
> > This commit taken from Rabeeh's Cubox kernel and re-worked for DT;
> > Sebastian Hasselbrath is believed to be the original author.
> >
> > Some Cuboxes require a GPIO for
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:55:51PM +, Russell King wrote:
> This commit taken from Rabeeh's Cubox kernel and re-worked for DT;
> Sebastian Hasselbrath is believed to be the original author.
>
> Some Cuboxes require a GPIO for card detection; this implements the
> optional GPIO support for card
19 matches
Mail list logo
