On Thursday, November 08, 2012, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> To ensure the stable clock need to enable before set the
> DW_MMC_CARD_NEED_INIT flag.
> If set DW_MMC_CARD_NEED_INIT flag, wait for 80-clock before first command
> after power-up.
As we have discussed, the location of 'dw_mci_setup_bus' see
On 11/26/2012 06:17 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20121115:
>
on i386:
drivers/built-in.o: In function `tifm_sd_request':
tifm_sd.c:(.text+0x588f95): undefined reference to `__udivdi3'
somewhere inside tifm_sd_request():
I'm guessing that the call to tifm_sd_set_d
Hi Manoj,
On Mon, Nov 26 2012, Manoj Iyer wrote:
> Do you know what systems produce these errors? I can look and see if
> we have those for testing your patch.
One T430s using the ExpressCard reader¹, and one X220, both with :e823.
Thanks,
- Chris.
¹: http://support.lenovo.com/en_US/product-an
Chris,
Do you know what systems produce these errors? I can look and see if we
have those for testing your patch.
Cheers
Manoj
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012, Chris Ball wrote:
Hi Manoj, Matsumuro-san,
On Mon, Jul 18 2011, Manoj Iyer wrote:
Right, without the patch I get..
[ 52.526665] mmc0: new
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 08 2012, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> clk_{un}prepare is mandatory for platforms using common clock framework.
> Because
> for SPEAr we don't do anything in clk_{un}prepare() calls, just call them ones
> in probe/remove.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-sp
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 08 2012, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> From: Vipul Kumar Samar
>
> SPEAr sdhci driver expects the clock to be set to 50 MHz for proper
> functioning.
> This patch sets clk to 50 MHz in probe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vipul Kumar Samar
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/s
Hello,
On 11/19/2012 11:34 PM, Per Förlin wrote:
On 11/19/2012 03:32 PM, Per Förlin wrote:
On 11/19/2012 10:48 AM, Konstantin Dorfman wrote:
I'm fine with wait_event() (block request transfers) combined with completion
(for other transfer), as long as the core.c API is intact. I don't see a
On 26 November 2012 20:39, Chris Ball wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08 2012, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> + ret = clk_set_rate(sdhci->clk, 5000);
>> + if (ret)
>> + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Error setting desired clk, clk=%lu\n",
>> + clk_get_rate(sdhci->clk));
>> +
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 08 2012, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> From: Vipul Kumar Samar
>
> SPEAr sdhci driver expects the clock to be set to 50 MHz for proper
> functioning.
> This patch sets clk to 50 MHz in probe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vipul Kumar Samar
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/s
On 20 November 2012 12:11, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 8 November 2012 20:39, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> From: Vipul Kumar Samar
>>
>> SPEAr sdhci driver expects the clock to be set to 50 MHz for proper
>> functioning.
>> This patch sets clk to 50 MHz in probe.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vipul Kumar Samar
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 2:19 AM, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi Venkat,
>
> On Mon, Nov 19 2012, Venkatraman S wrote:
>> From: Balaji T K
>>
>> "commit ae4bf788ee9bf7c2d51b0309117d1fcccbdd50a2
>> mmc: omap_hsmmc: consolidate error report handling of HSMMC IRQ"
>> sets both end_cmd and end_trans to 1.
>>
On 11/26/2012 11:27 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:20:32AM +0100, Per Förlin wrote:
>> On 11/22/2012 06:37 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 06:28:30PM +0100, Per Forlin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Russell King - ARM L
Hi,
I have ported linux-3.7-rc4 to a board with i.MX257 CPU.
As distribution I use Debian squeeze.
Booting time (with Xorg and IceWM) is different with different SD-Cards.
Boot time with 2GB Standard micro SD-Card: over 2:30 minutes
Boot time with 4GB Class 10 micro SDHC: 1:40 minutes
Boot time w
Hi Chris
Any comments on these 2 patches?
On 20 November 2012 14:43, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> kfree on a null pointer is a no-op.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat
> ---
> drivers/mmc/core/sdio_bus.c |3 +--
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sd
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:20:32AM +0100, Per Förlin wrote:
> On 11/22/2012 06:37 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 06:28:30PM +0100, Per Forlin wrote:
> >> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> >> wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 05:13:55PM
On 11/22/2012 06:37 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 06:28:30PM +0100, Per Forlin wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 05:13:55PM +0100, Per Forlin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Russell
Hi Chris
I see patches modified the public C file and Powerpc Host C file. But it also
used by other host C file.
So need to replace all the u64 division by macro div_u64 to avoid this error.
Two new patches had send and reviewed by Anton.
I think they can fix the `__aeabi_uldivmod' error.
All th
Convert the cmd_timeou_ms to u64 to avoid overflow
Signed-off-by: Jerry Huang
Signed-off-by: Haijun Zhang
Reviewed-by: Anton Vorontsov
CC: Chris Ball
---
drivers/mmc/card/block.c |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c b/drivers/mmc/
As data timeout_ns use u64 to avoid overflow.
So we use macro div_u64 to perform a division.
Below C file modified:
- drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c
- drivers/mmc/host/bfin_sdh.c
- drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c
- drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c
- drivers/mmc/host/mvsdio.c
- drivers/mmc/host/mxs-mmc.c
Hi Chris
On Sun, 25 Nov 2012, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi, adding Guennadi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 23 2012, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 08:14:27PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> >> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 08:57:26AM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> >> > Does this work with
Hi, Anton
This patch was for public C file. That was for different Host controller.
I think let them standalone will be better.
The u32 conversion will be removed.
Thanks.
Regards
Haijun.
> -Original Message-
> From: Anton Vorontsov [mailto:cbouatmai...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, Nov
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:35:58PM +0800, Haijun Zhang wrote:
> Convert the cmd_timeou_ms to u64 to avoid overflow
>
> Signed-off-by: Jerry Huang
> Signed-off-by: Haijun Zhang
Reviewed-by: Anton Vorontsov
But I think you should merge the two patches...
Thanks,
> CC: Chris Ball
> ---
> dri
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:35:59PM +0800, Haijun Zhang wrote:
> As data timeout_ns use u64 to avoid overflow.
> So we use macro div_u64 to perform a division.
[...]
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c
> @@ -593,17 +593,16 @@ static void atmci_timeout_timer(unsi
As data timeout_ns use u64 to avoid overflow.
So we use macro div_u64 to perform a division.
Below C file modified:
- drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c
- drivers/mmc/host/bfin_sdh.c
- drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c
- drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c
- drivers/mmc/host/mvsdio.c
- drivers/mmc/host/mxs-mmc.c
Convert the cmd_timeou_ms to u64 to avoid overflow
Signed-off-by: Jerry Huang
Signed-off-by: Haijun Zhang
CC: Anton Vorontsov
CC: Chris Ball
---
drivers/mmc/card/block.c |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c b/drivers/mmc/card/bloc
25 matches
Mail list logo