Hi Joseph
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013, Joseph Lo wrote:
> Hi Guennadi,
>
> > MMC defines a number of standard DT bindings. Having each driver parse
> > them individually adds code redundancy and is error prone. Provide a
> > standard function to unify the parsing. After all drivers are
> converted
> > t
On Friday 25 January 2013 02:19 AM, Matt Porter wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 05:12:05AM +, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
On Thursday 24 January 2013 02:19 AM, Matt Porter wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 04:37:55PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
Matt,
On Wednesday 16 January 2013 02:02 AM, M
On 21.01.2013 12:02, Shawn Guo wrote:
The series makes Auto CMD23 work for imx6q usdhc and then adds 8bit
mmc support.
Sascha Hauer (2):
mmc: sdhci: rename platform_8bit_width to platform_bus_width
mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: support 8bit mode
Shawn Guo (4):
mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: separate trans
On 15.01.2013 16:36, Shawn Guo wrote:
Rename esdhc local definitions with ESDHC_ rather than SDHCI_ prefix,
so that we can distinguish them from SDHCI core definitions from name.
A couple of bit fields are also changed use shift for consistency and
better readability.
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo
On 15.01.2013 16:36, Shawn Guo wrote:
SDHCI_CTRL_D3CD is not a standard SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL, so there is no
need to check it in SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL write at all. Remove it.
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo
Tested-by: Dirk Behme
Tested on i.MX6.
Thanks
Dirk
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
Hi Guennadi,
> MMC defines a number of standard DT bindings. Having each driver parse
> them individually adds code redundancy and is error prone. Provide a
> standard function to unify the parsing. After all drivers are
converted
> to using it instead of their own parsers, this function can be
in
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 05:12:05AM +, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
> On Thursday 24 January 2013 02:19 AM, Matt Porter wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 04:37:55PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> >> Matt,
> >>
> >> On Wednesday 16 January 2013 02:02 AM, Matt Porter wrote:
> >>
> >> [..]
> >>
>
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 05:14:13AM +, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> Matt,
>
> On 1/24/2013 3:07 AM, Matt Porter wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:21:42AM +0800, Mark Brown wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 09:26:34PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> >>> On 1/16/2013 2:02 AM, Matt Porter wrote:
> >>
>
On 24 January 2013 18:12, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> wrote:
>
>> The clock can be masked independently too via the clock enable bit in
>> the clock register.
>>
>> However, it's interesting to note: experiments that Linus did with having
>>
This patch adds the compatible string for MSHC controller of Exynos4412, and
share the controller specific properties with Exynos5250 since they have same
features. Its driver data name is changed to exynos5_drv_data not to use SoC
specific name.
Signed-off-by: Dongjin Kim
---
drivers/mmc/host/d
Hi,
Is there a standard support for providing the MMC host OCR mask in the
device tree structure?
I'm using ARM PrimeCell PL180/181 Multimedia Card Interface driver.
In 'mmci_dt_populate_generic_pdata' I cannot see any evidence for parsing
oct mask.
I wonder if I can just add to the function:
of_p
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> The clock can be masked independently too via the clock enable bit in
> the clock register.
>
> However, it's interesting to note: experiments that Linus did with having
> the primecell automatically masking the clock to the card
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 24 2013, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> I tried to keep this binding similar to others, that I proposed in "mmc:
> add DT bindings for more MMC capability flags." Actually, the above is
> indeed wrong, I would call it "cap-sdio-irq." And in that patch I tried to
> keep binding n
On Thu, 24 Jan 2013, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jan 24 2013, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > After an internal discussion it occurred to us, that this binding
> >
> > On Wed, 23 Jan 2013, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> >> +- toshiba,mmc-cap-sdio-irq: SDIO IRQ
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 24 2013, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> After an internal discussion it occurred to us, that this binding
>
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2013, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>> +- toshiba,mmc-cap-sdio-irq : SDIO IRQ signalling should be used, if
>> +supported by the hardware, i
After an internal discussion it occurred to us, that this binding
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
[snip]
> +- toshiba,mmc-cap-sdio-irq : SDIO IRQ signalling should be used, if
> + supported by the hardware, i.e. set MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ if
> + TMIO_MMC_SDIO_IRQ is also se
On 24 January 2013 13:59, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 01:48:39PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> Correct. ST-variants requires to use the POWER register to gate the
>> clock. So if this is not the case for VE you don't need to bother,
>> otherwise you should set "pwrreg_
On 24 January 2013 14:04, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 24 January 2013 13:54, Pawel Moll wrote:
>> Hi Chris,
>>
>> On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 15:38 +, Pawel Moll wrote:
>>> The Versatile Express IOFPGA as shipped on VECD 5.0 (bitfiles v108/208
>>> and v116/216) contains a modified version of the PL180
On 24 January 2013 13:54, Pawel Moll wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 15:38 +, Pawel Moll wrote:
>> The Versatile Express IOFPGA as shipped on VECD 5.0 (bitfiles v108/208
>> and v116/216) contains a modified version of the PL180 MMCI, with
>> PeriphID Configuration value changed to
On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 12:57 +, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi Pawel,
>
> On Fri, Dec 14 2012, Pawel Moll wrote:
> > The Versatile Express IOFPGA as shipped on VECD 5.0 (bitfiles v108/208
> > and v116/216) contains a modified version of the PL180 MMCI, with
> > PeriphID Configuration value changed to 0
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 01:48:39PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> Correct. ST-variants requires to use the POWER register to gate the
> clock. So if this is not the case for VE you don't need to bother,
> otherwise you should set "pwrreg_clkgate" for this variant as well.
The ARM variant does gate th
Hi Pawel,
On Fri, Dec 14 2012, Pawel Moll wrote:
> The Versatile Express IOFPGA as shipped on VECD 5.0 (bitfiles v108/208
> and v116/216) contains a modified version of the PL180 MMCI, with
> PeriphID Configuration value changed to 0x2.
>
> This version adds an optional "hardware flow control" fea
On 23 January 2013 12:18, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2013, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:13:49AM +, Lee Jones wrote:
>> > On Tue, 22 Jan 2013, Lee Jones wrote:
>> > > Are you saying that you won't do it? :)
>> > >
>> > > Is there anything I can do to ma
Hi Chris,
On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 15:38 +, Pawel Moll wrote:
> The Versatile Express IOFPGA as shipped on VECD 5.0 (bitfiles v108/208
> and v116/216) contains a modified version of the PL180 MMCI, with
> PeriphID Configuration value changed to 0x2.
>
> This version adds an optional "hardware fl
Hi Pawel,
On 24 January 2013 13:36, Pawel Moll wrote:
> Hello Ulf,
>
> On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 11:05 +, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 14 December 2012 16:38, Pawel Moll wrote:
>> > The Versatile Express IOFPGA as shipped on VECD 5.0 (bitfiles v108/208
>> > and v116/216) contains a modified version
Hello Ulf,
On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 11:05 +, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 14 December 2012 16:38, Pawel Moll wrote:
> > The Versatile Express IOFPGA as shipped on VECD 5.0 (bitfiles v108/208
> > and v116/216) contains a modified version of the PL180 MMCI, with
> > PeriphID Configuration value changed
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 05:46:18PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Without barriers SDIO operations fail with runtime PM enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc.h | 14 --
> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff
On Thu, 24 Jan 2013, Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:20:19PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Jan 2013, Paul Mundt wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 05:46:18PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > > Without barriers SDIO operations fail with runtime PM
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:20:19PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2013, Paul Mundt wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 05:46:18PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > Without barriers SDIO operations fail with runtime PM enabled.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Guennadi Lia
On Thu, 24 Jan 2013, Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 05:46:18PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > Without barriers SDIO operations fail with runtime PM enabled.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski
> > ---
> > drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc.h | 14 --
> > 1 fi
30 matches
Mail list logo
