Hi,
On 16-12-14 01:37, David Lanzendörfer wrote:
When there is only one DES available the DMA performs a FIFO reset and waits
until the reinitialization has been completed.
Disabling the SDXC_IDMAC_DES0_DIC bit prevents the DMA from sending an
interrupt after it has finished this
DMA configuration has been removed from function mmci_dma_setup but the
local mask variable was not removed. This remains unused hence remove
it from the function and operations on it
Signed-off-by: Pramod Gurav pramod.gu...@smartplayin.com
---
drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c |5 -
1 file
Hello
This patchset was inspired questions from 李想 of Allwinner and incorporates as
well suggestions from Hans related to spin locks.
For example have not all attributes of the shared host object been protected
by the spin lock, this has been changed.
Also some register names and reset behavior
Removing a relict from reverse engineering of the Android driver code in
sunxi_mmc_clk_set_rate.
Signed-off-by: David Lanzendörfer david.lanzendoer...@o2s.ch
Reported-by: 李想 lixi...@allwinnertech.com
---
drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c | 10 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9
Fixing the register name in sunxi_mmc_reset_host since the SDXC_HARDWARE_RESET
bit
is actually located within REG_GCTRL and not REG_CMDR as it was pointed out by
Allwinner.
Signed-off-by: David Lanzendörfer david.lanzendoer...@o2s.ch
Reported-by: 李想 lixi...@allwinnertech.com
---
From: Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com
The last descriptor might be the first descriptor as well, so use masking to
add the LD (last descriptor) bit and drop the DIC (disable interrupt on
completion) bit rather then hard assignment as hard assigment will override
the FD (first descriptor) bit if
1) Adding a comment in order to clarify the choice of the locks within
sunxi_mmc_handle_manual_stop
2) As 李想 has pointed out the wait_dma variable was not accessed within the
spin lock
block in sunxi_mmc_request and so (even if it should never happend) it
would have
Hi,
On 16-12-14 15:10, David Lanzendörfer wrote:
Hello
This patchset was inspired questions from 李想 of Allwinner and incorporates as
well suggestions from Hans related to spin locks.
For example have not all attributes of the shared host object been protected
by the spin lock, this has been
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Bjorn Andersson bj...@kryo.se wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 8:48 PM, Tim Kryger tim.kry...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 11:22 PM, Bjorn Andersson bj...@kryo.se wrote:
[..]
Or simply; what is vmmc (in the code) supposed to represent?
Hi Bjorn,
On 12/14/2014 09:48 PM, Tim Kryger wrote:
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 11:22 PM, Bjorn Andersson bj...@kryo.se wrote:
...
Or simply; what is vmmc (in the code) supposed to represent?
Hi Bjorn,
VMMC is the supply that delivers power out to the SD card itself (aka VDD).
It is not the internal
Static checkers complain about the inconsistent NULL checking here:
drivers/mmc/host/mxs-mmc.c:680 mxs_mmc_probe()
warn: variable dereferenced before check 'ssp-dmach' (see line 660)
The variable can't actually be NULL so we can remove the check.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Bjorn Andersson bj...@kryo.se wrote:
We are routing the regulators straight to vdd of the memory and should
hence use vmmc to specify this. However unless I actually program 0x29
in the Qualcomm sdhci block I get no responses from the card.
Which I believe
12 matches
Mail list logo
