On 1 June 2015 at 21:42, Dmitry Torokhov dmitry.torok...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Ulf,
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 12:18:25PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
Other subsystem buses attach PM domains during probe, but prior calling
the driver's -probe() method. During the removal phase, detaching the PM
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 09:54:13AM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On the other hand, the long term plan is to have PM domain pointers
assigned at device registration point instead of at probe. Since
driver core then invokes the -activate|sync|dismiss() callbacks, it
will make the
-Original Message-
From: Ulf Hansson [mailto:ulf.hans...@linaro.org]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 4:29 PM
To: Justin Wang (王丁)
Cc: kuninori.morimoto...@renesas.com; jh80.ch...@samsung.com;
a...@linux-foundation.org; jbottom...@odin.com; b...@decadent.org.uk;
Add SDHCI_QUIRK2_CIRCUIT_SUPPORT_VS33 for T4240
Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu yangbo...@freescale.com
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c
b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c
index 22e9111..4f5fe42 100644
---
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 09:51:01AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
What would resolve that would be to have the device registration succeed,
but also to scan all devices in the system when a PM domain is attached
and attach the PM domain to matching devices. The problem you then have
MMC_PM_KEEP_POWER doesn't imply MMC_PM_WAKE_SDIO_IRQ, we should only
enable device wake up when MMC_PM_WAKE_SDIO_IRQ is set. And pm_flags
is the requested pm features, we should not set it in the host driver.
At the same time, device wakeup is disabled by default, so there's no
need to disable
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 05:32:50PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
On 05/29/2015 01:18 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:42:27AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Vinod Koul vinod.k...@intel.com wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 04:25:57PM +0300,
On 2 June 2015 at 13:07, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 09:51:01AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
What would resolve that would be to have the device registration succeed,
but also to scan all devices in the system when a PM domain is
Hi,
I'm confused by the pwrseq-emmc registering a restart_handler for resetting an
emmc in a panic-reboot case at priority 129 to schedules it just before
system reboot.
From what I remember from the restart-handler discussion the actuall usage is
traversing the ordered list until one
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 03:18:07PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On 2 June 2015 at 13:07, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 09:51:01AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
What would resolve that would be to have the device registration succeed,
On 06/02/2015 08:29 AM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
Hi,
I'm confused by the pwrseq-emmc registering a restart_handler for resetting an
emmc in a panic-reboot case at priority 129 to schedules it just before
system reboot.
From what I remember from the restart-handler discussion the actuall usage is
11 matches
Mail list logo
